Steering for Sustainable Development: a Typology of Problems and Strategies with respect to Ambivalence, Uncertainty and Distributed Power
- 1 September 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning
- Vol. 9 (3-4) , 193-212
Abstract
Special features of sustainable development as a governance problem are contrasted with a conventional rationalist ideal of steering based on the unambiguous determination of goals, availability of knowledge to predict consequences and concentration of power to implement strategies. This leads into the elaboration of three problem dimensions of steering for sustainable development: ambivalence of sustainability as a goal, uncertainty of knowledge due to complex interactions between society, technology and nature, and distributed power to shape structural change in society. The problem dimensions are taken as a basis for a typology of steering situations and a review of existing theoretical concepts of steering in society. The paper argues for a differentiated discussion of steering capacities in respect to concrete situations. Along these lines, it presents an approach to match strategies with problems.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Steering for Sustainable Development: a Typology of Problems and Strategies with respect to Ambivalence, Uncertainty and Distributed PowerJournal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 2007
- Symbolic environmental legislation and societal self-deceptionEnvironmental Politics, 2007
- The Complexity TurnTheory, Culture & Society, 2005
- Uncertainty and Participatory DemocracyEnvironmental Values, 2003
- Science for the Twenty‐First Century: From Social Contract to the Scientific CoreInternational Social Science Journal, 2001
- Organizing Babylon ‐ On the Different Conceptions of Policy NetworksPublic Administration, 1998
- Challenges in the use of science for sustainable developmentInternational Journal of Sustainable Development, 1998
- Economic governance and the analysis of structural change in the American economy1991
- Research reports. Compromise and logroll: Comparing the efficiency of two bargaining processesSystems Research and Behavioral Science, 1970
- The Science of "Muddling Through"Public Administration Review, 1959