Anchors or relational risks? Educator and psychologist narratives of attachment in child–robot relationships
Open Access
- 23 March 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Educational Psychology
Abstract
Background: As AI‐enabled social robots become more common in schools, children may form strong emotional bonds with them despite robots not being caregivers and lacking the capacities for “true” attachment. Given limited understanding of potential risks and safeguards, professional perspectives are needed to inform responsible design and educational use. Aims: This study explores how educators and psychologists interpret children's attachment‐like (parallel yet different from caregiver‐child ties) bonds with social robots. Sample(s): 123 Greek professionals (62 educators, 61 psychologists) evaluated three vignettes depicting core attachment features, applying human Attachment Theory to child‐robot interactions. Methods: Participants provided written responses to three attachment‐focused vignettes, which were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis to identify recurrent themes in professionals’ interpretations of child–robot bonding. Results: Thematic analysis revealed nine themes: secure bond architecture, robot role negotiation, and balancing potential benefits against risks. Participants emphasised trust, emotional safety, and predictability, while warning against over‐identification and dependency. Personalisation, memory, and responsiveness fostered intimacy but raised also ethical concerns. Strict privacy controls and adult mediation were deemed necessary. Robots were seen as fostering emotional resilience, social scaffolding, and personalised learning, but also as causing dependency, isolation, privacy breaches, and blurred boundaries. Most participants supported a functional alliance model – robots as supervised, goal‐directed learning tools that enhance socioemotional development and transfer it to human relationships, not as attachment substitutes. Conclusions: The Child‐Robot Emotional Bonding Ecosystem framework integrates these insights, showing how design, mediation, and pedagogy shape development. Findings from Greece stress intentional design, adult guidance, and strict ethics to support, not supplant, human growth.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exploring Emotional Connections: A Systematic Literature Review of Attachment in Human-Robot InteractionInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 2025
- Effectiveness of social robots as a tutoring and learning companion: a bibliometric analysisCogent Business & Management, 2024
- Moral considerations on social robots in education: A multi-stakeholder perspectiveComputers & Education, 2021
- Can social robots affect children's prosocial behavior? An experimental study on prosocial robot modelsComputers in Human Behavior, 2021
- Using vignettes in educational research: a framework for vignette constructionInternational Journal of Research & Method in Education, 2019
- A Robot that Encourages Self-disclosure by Hug2017
- Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valleyCognition, 2012
- Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic reviewComputers & Education, 2012
- An attachment perspective on human–pet relationships: Conceptualization and assessment of pet attachment orientationsJournal of Research in Personality, 2011
- Mass Communication and Para-Social InteractionPsychiatry, 1956