Decision Support by Interval SMART/SWING—Incorporating Imprecision in the SMART and SWING Methods
- 4 April 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Decision Sciences
- Vol. 36 (2) , 317-339
Abstract
Interval judgments are a way of handling preferential and informational imprecision in multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA). In this article, we study the use of intervals in the simple multiattribute rating technique (SMART) and SWING weighting methods. We generalize the methods by allowing the reference attribute to be any attribute, not just the most or the least important one, and by allowing the decision maker to reply with intervals to the weight ratio questions to account for his/her judgmental imprecision. We also study the practical and procedural implications of using imprecision intervals in these methods. These include, for example, how to select the reference attribute to identify as many dominated alternatives as possible. Based on the results of a simulation study, we suggest guidelines for how to carry out the weighting process in practice. Computer support can be used to make the process visual and interactive. We describe the WINPRE software for interval SMART/SWING, preference assessment by imprecise ratio statements (PAIRS), and preference programming. The use of interval SMART/SWING is illustrated by a job selection example.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Decision Making with Uncertain Judgments: A Stochastic Formulation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process*Decision Sciences, 2003
- Decisionarium—aiding decisions, negotiating and collecting opinions on the webJournal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 2003
- Preference ratios in multiattribute evaluation (PRIME)-elicitation and decision procedures under incomplete informationIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 2001
- Establishing dominance and potential optimality in multi-criteria analysis with imprecise weight and valueComputers & Operations Research, 2001
- Stochastic Judgments in the AHP: The Measurement of Rank Reversal ProbabilitiesDecision Sciences, 1997
- Preference programming through approximate ratio comparisonsEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 1995
- Uncertainty and Imprecision: Modelling and AnalysisJournal of the Operational Research Society, 1995
- SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility MeasurementOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1994
- Preference simulation and preference programming: robustness issues in priority derivationEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 1993
- A critical survey on the status of multiple criteria decision making theory and practiceOmega, 1992