Real‐world outcomes of venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents in unfit acute myeloid leukaemia: Results of the GIMEMA AML2320 trial
Authors:
- Raffaele PalmieriRPRaffaele Palmieri
- Alfonso PiciocchiAPAlfonso Piciocchi
- Stefano SodduSSStefano Soddu
- Marco FrigeniMFMarco Frigeni
- Erika BorlenghiEBErika Borlenghi
- Nicola FracchiollaNFNicola Fracchiolla
- Maria Paola MartelliMMMaria Paola Martelli
- Ernesta AudisioEAErnesta Audisio
- Alessandro CignettiACAlessandro Cignetti
- Calogero VetroCVCalogero Vetro
- Nicola di RienzoNRNicola di Rienzo
- 17 August 2026
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Haematology
- Vol. 209 (4) , 1735-1745
Abstract
Summary: Venetoclax (VEN) plus hypomethylating agents (HMAs) represents the standard of care for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy, but prospective real‐world observational data outside randomized clinical trials remain limited. The Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell'Adulto (GIMEMA) AML2320 is a prospective, multicentre, observational study (NCT04589728) including 193 newly diagnosed unfit AML patients receiving VEN plus azacitidine or decitabine between November 2020 and December 2021. Primary end‐point was overall survival (OS); secondary end‐points included composite complete remission (cCR), disease‐free survival and safety. Median age was 74 years with 42% of patients being ≥75 years. After completing cycle 4, cCR was achieved in 73% of the patients, with 54% responding before cycle 2. After a median follow‐up of 23 months, median OS was 13.0 months. cCR achievement within cycle 4 correlated with longer OS (19.1 vs. 9.1 months, p = 0.001). Patients receiving 400 mg VEN without azoles had improved OS compared with those on reduced doses with azoles (18.2 vs. 11.4 months, p = 0.015). An anchored matching‐adjusted indirect comparison with the phase III VIALE‐A trial (NCT02993523) showed comparable median OS (14.8 months vs. 14.9 months; p = 0.6). The GIMEMA AML2320 trial confirmed the efficacy of VEN/HMAs in a prospective, real‐world unfit population. Early remission was associated with improved outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- A real-world analysis of the impact of azole antifungal prophylaxis on outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia treated with venetoclax-based therapyLeukemia Research, 2026
- Navigating acute myeloid leukemia towards better outcomes: Treatment pathways and challenges for patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapyBlood Reviews, 2025
- Long‐term follow‐up of VIALE‐A: Venetoclax and azacitidine in chemotherapy‐ineligible untreated acute myeloid leukemiaAmerican Journal of Hematology, 2024
- Timing of response with venetoclax combination treatment in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemiaAmerican Journal of Hematology, 2022
- De novo acute myeloid leukemia: A population‐based study of outcome in the United States based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, 1980 to 2017Cancer, 2021
- Dose adjustment of venetoclax when co-administered with posaconazole: clinical drug–drug interaction predictions using a PBPK approachCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2021
- The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partnersJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2019
- Management of Venetoclax-Posaconazole Interaction in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: Evaluation of Dose AdjustmentsClinical Therapeutics, 2017
- Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons: A New Tool for Timely Comparative Effectiveness ResearchValue in Health, 2012
- Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics supportJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2009