Investigating the ecological fallacy through sampling distributions constructed from finite populations
Preprint
- 2 January 2024
- preprint
- Published by Springer Nature in Research Square
Abstract
Correlation coefficients and linear regression values computed from group averages can differ from correlation coefficients and linear regression values computed using individual scores. This observation known as the ecological fallacy often assumes that all the individual scores are available from a population. In many situations, one must use a sample from the larger population. In such cases, the computed correlation coefficient and linear regression values will depend on the sample that is chosen and the underlying sampling distribution. The sampling distribution of correlation coefficients and linear regression values for group averages will be identical to the sampling distribution for individuals for normally distributed variables for samples drawn from infinitely large continuous distributions. However, data that is acquired in practice is often acquired when sampling without replacement from a finite population. Our objective is to demonstrate through Monte Carlo simulations that thesampling distributions for correlation and linear regression will also be similar for individuals and group averages when sampling without replacement from normally distributed variables. These simulations suggest that when a sample from a population is selected, the correlation coefficients and linear regression values computed from individual scores will not be more accurate in estimating the entire population values compared to samples when group averages are used as long as the sample size is the same.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of Census-based Aggregate Variables to Proxy for Socioeconomic Group: Evidence from National SamplesAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1998
- Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data1997
- THE ECOLOGICAL FALLACYAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1988
- Correlation, Regression, and the Ecological Fallacy: A CritiqueJournal of Interdisciplinary History, 1974
- Ecological Regressions and Behavior of IndividualsAmerican Sociological Review, 1953
- Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of IndividualsAmerican Sociological Review, 1950
- A Survey of the Theory of Small SamplesAnnals of Mathematics, 1930
- The general sampling distribution of the multiple correlation coefficientProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, 1928
- FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF THE VALUES OF THE CORRELATION COEFFIENTS IN SAMPLES FROM AN INDEFINITELY LARGE POPU;ATIONBiometrika, 1915
- On the Probable Errors of Frequency Constants: Part II. EditorialBiometrika, 1913