Building Community Engagement Capacity in a Transdisciplinary Population Health Research Consortium
Authors:
- Aimee JamesAJAimee James
- Tamera Coyne-BeasleyTCTamera Coyne-Beasley
- Shayna CunninghamSCShayna Cunningham
- Ayah El-FarmawiAEAyah El-Farmawi
- Bernard HarlowBHBernard Harlow
- Lisa Kane LowLLLisa Kane Low
- Heather KlusaritzHKHeather Klusaritz
- Terri LipmanTLTerri Lipman
- Julia MakiJMJulia Maki
- Jesse NodoraJNJesse Nodora
- Melissa SimonMSMelissa Simon
- Jeni Hebert-BeirneJHJeni Hebert-Beirne
Open Access
- 3 January 2024
- journal article
- Published by The University of Alabama, Division of Community Affairs in Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship
- Vol. 16 (2)
Abstract
Community engagement has been named a research priority by the National Institutes of Health, and scholars are calling for community engagement as an approach to address racism and equity in science. Robust community-engaged research can improve research quality, increase inclusion of traditionally marginalized populations, broaden the impact of findings on real-life situations, and is particularly valuable for underexplored research topics. The goal of this paper is to describe lessons learned and best practices that emerged from community engagement in a multi-institution population health research consortium. We describe how a foundation was laid to enable community-engaged research activities in the consortium, using a staged and stepped process to build and embed multi-level community-engaged research approaches. We staged our development to facilitate (a) awareness of community engagement among consortium members, (b) the building of solidarity and alliances, and (c) the initiation of long-term engagement to allow for meaningful research translation. Our stepped process involved strategic planning; building momentum; institutionalizing engagement into the consortium infrastructure; and developing, implementing, and evaluating a plan. We moved from informal, one-time community interactions to systematic, formalized, capacity-building reciprocal engagement. We share our speed bumps and troubleshooting that inform our recommendations for other large research consortia—including investing the time it takes to build up community engagement capacity, acknowledging and drawing on strengths of the communities of interest, assuring a strong infrastructure of accountability for community engagement, and grounding the work in anti-racist principles.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Community Engagement StudiosAcademic Medicine, 2015
- Understanding the Supports of and Challenges to Community Engagement in the CTSAsClinical and Translational Science, 2014
- Community engagement to reduce inequalities in health: a systematic review, meta-analysis and economic analysisPublic Health Research, 2013
- Community-Engaged Research Perspectives: Then and NowAcademic Pediatrics, 2013
- Research Ethics Education for Community-Engaged Research: A Review and Research AgendaJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2012
- Community ACTION Boards: An Innovative Model for Effective Community-Academic Research PartnershipsProgress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 2011
- Community Engagement in Research: Frameworks for Education and Peer ReviewAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2010
- The Art and Science of Integrating Undoing Racism with CBPR: Challenges of Pursuing NIH Funding to Investigate Cancer Care and Racial EquityJournal of Urban Health, 2006
- Ethical Goals of Community Consultation in ResearchAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2005
- Partnership Synergy: A Practical Framework for Studying and Strengthening the Collaborative AdvantageThe Milbank Quarterly, 2001