Evaluation of the Ginsburg Scheme: Where Is Significant Prostate Cancer Missed?
Authors:
- August SigleAugust Sigle
- Cordula A. JilgCJCordula A. Jilg
- Timur H. KuruTKTimur H. Kuru
- Nadine BinderNBNadine Binder
- Jakob MichaelisJMJakob Michaelis
- Markus GrabbertMGMarkus Grabbert
- Wolfgang Schultze-SeemannWSWolfgang Schultze-Seemann
- Arkadiusz MiernikAMArkadiusz Miernik
- Christian GratzkeCGChristian Gratzke
- Matthias BenndorfMBMatthias Benndorf
- Rodrigo Suarez-IbarrolaRodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola
Open Access
Abstract
Background: Systematic biopsy (SB) according to the Ginsburg scheme (GBS) is widely used to complement MRI-targeted biopsy (MR-TB) for optimizing the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (sPCa). Knowledge of the GBS’s blind sectors where sPCa is missed is crucial to improve biopsy strategies. Methods: We analyzed cancer detection rates in 1084 patients that underwent MR-TB and SB. Cancerous lesions that were missed or underestimated by GBS were re-localized onto a prostate map encompassing Ginsburg sectors and blind-sectors (anterior, central, basodorsal and basoventral). Logistic regression analysis (LRA) and prostatic configuration analysis were applied to identify predictors for missing sPCa with the GBS. Results: GBS missed sPCa in 39 patients (39/1084, 3.6%). In 27 cases (27/39, 69.2%), sPCa was missed within a blind sector, with 17/39 lesions localized in the anterior region (43.6%). Neither LRA nor prostatic configuration analysis identified predictors for missing sPCa with the GBS. Conclusions: This is the first study to analyze the distribution of sPCa missed by the GBS. GBS misses sPCa in few men only, with the majority localized in the anterior region. Adding blind sectors to GBS defined a new sector map of the prostate suited for reporting histopathological biopsy results.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer DiagnosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2020
- “TREXIT 2020”: why the time to abandon transrectal prostate biopsy starts nowProstate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2020
- The Value of PSA Density in Combination with PI-RADS™ for the Accuracy of Prostate Cancer PredictionJournal of Urology, 2017
- EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative IntentEuropean Urology, 2017
- Multicentre evaluation of targeted and systematic biopsies using magnetic resonance and ultrasound image‐fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsyBJU International, 2016
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Robot-Guided, Software Based Transperineal MRI/TRUS Fusion Biopsy of the Prostate in a High Risk Population of Previously Biopsy Negative MenBioMed Research International, 2016
- Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy versus Transperineal Template Prostate Mapping Biopsy in the Detection of Localised Radio-recurrent Prostate CancerClinical Oncology, 2016
- Definitions of terms, processes and a minimum dataset for transperineal prostate biopsies: a standardization approach of the G insburg S tudy G roup for E nhanced P rostate D iagnosticsBJU International, 2013
- Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Image Targeted Prostate Biopsy Versus Transperineal Template Prostate Biopsy in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 2013
- Appropriate Patient Selection in the Focal Treatment of Prostate Cancer: The Role of Transperineal 3-Dimensional Pathologic Mapping of the Prostate—A 4-Year ExperienceUrology, 2007