Evaluating the effectiveness of a large multi‐use MPA in protecting Key Biodiversity Areas for marine predators
Open Access
- 14 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Diversity and Distributions
- Vol. 26 (6) , 715-729
Abstract
Aim: Marine protected areas can serve to regulate harvesting and conserve biodiversity. Within large multi‐use MPAs, it is often unclear to what degree critical sites of biodiversity are afforded protection against commercial activities. Addressing this issue is a prerequisite if we are to appropriately assess sites against conservation targets. We evaluated whether the management regime of a large MPA conserved sites (Key Biodiversity Areas, KBAs) supporting the global persistence of top marine predators.Location: Southwest Atlantic Ocean.Method: We collated population and tracking data (1,418 tracks) from 14 marine predator species (Procellariiformes, Sphenisciformes, Pinnipedia) that breed at South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands, and identified hotspots for their conservation under the recently developed KBA framework. We then evaluated the spatiotemporal overlap of these sites and the different management regimes of krill, demersal longline and pelagic trawl fisheries operating within a large MPA, which was created with the intention to protect marine predator species.Results: We identified 12 new global marine KBAs that are important for this community of top predators, both within and beyond the focal MPA. Only three species consistently used marine areas at a time when a potentially higher‐risk fishery was allowed to operate in that area, while other interactions between fisheries and our target species were mostly precluded by MPA management plans.Main conclusions: We show that current fishery management measures within the MPA contribute to protecting top predators considered in this study and that resource harvesting within the MPA does not pose a major threat—under current climate conditions. Unregulated fisheries beyond the MPA, however, pose a likely threat to identified KBAs. Our approach demonstrates the utility of the KBA guidelines and multispecies tracking data to assess the contributing role of well‐designed MPAs in achieving local and internationally agreed conservation targets.Keywords
Funding Information
- Pew Bertarelli Ocean Legacy Project of the Pew Charitable Trusts and Bertarelli Foundation
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- The role of science and advocacy in the conservation of Southern Ocean albatrosses at seaBird Conservation International, 2008
- Marine mammals as ecosystem sentinelsJournal of Mammalogy, 2008
- Are seabirds foraging for unpredictable resources?Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 2007
- The package “adehabitat” for the R software: A tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animalsEcological Modelling, 2006
- Management of Southern Ocean fisheries: global forces and future sustainabilityAntarctic Science, 2004
- Distribution of foraging by female Antarctic fur sealsMarine Ecology Progress Series, 2002
- Systematic conservation planningNature, 2000
- Foraging and provisioning in Antarctic fur seals: interannual variability in time-energy budgetsBehavioral Ecology, 1999
- Dietary segregation of krill‐eating South Georgia seabirdsJournal of Zoology, 1997
- Factors Affecting the Growth Rate and Mass at Weaning of Antarctic Fur Seals at Bird Island, South GeorgiaJournal of Mammalogy, 1993