Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement
Authors:
- David MoherDMDavid Moher
- Alessandro LiberatiALAlessandro Liberati
- Jennifer TetzlaffJTJennifer Tetzlaff
- Douglas G AltmanDADouglas G Altman
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 21 July 2009
- journal article
- Vol. 3 (3) , e123-e130
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Value judgments in the analysis and synthesis of evidenceJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2008
- Systematic reviews: when is an update an update?The Lancet, 2006
- Putting clinical trials into contextThe Lancet, 2005
- Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal EditorsCanadian Medical Association Journal, 2004
- Number of published systematic reviews and global burden of disease: database analysisBMJ, 2003
- Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statementThe Lancet, 1999
- Meta-analysis: an update.1996
- Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group1994
- The Medical Review Article: State of the ScienceAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1987
- Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987