The Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia) guidelines for the management of acute and chronic hemorrhoidal disease
Authors:
- Antonio BrillantinoABAntonio Brillantino
- Adolfo RenziARAdolfo Renzi
- Pasquale TalentoPTPasquale Talento
- Luigi BruscianoLBLuigi Brusciano
- Luigi MaranoLuigi Marano
- Maurizio GrilloMGMaurizio Grillo
- Mauro Natale MaglioMMMauro Natale Maglio
- Fabrizio ForoniFFFabrizio Foroni
- Alessio PalumboAPAlessio Palumbo
- Maria Laura Sandoval SoteloMSMaria Laura Sandoval Sotelo
- Luciano VicenzoLVLuciano Vicenzo
- Michele LanzaMichele Lanza
Open Access
- 31 August 2024
- journal article
- guideline
- Published by Korean Society of Coloproctology in Annals of Coloproctology
- Vol. 40 (4) , 287-320
Abstract
The aim of these evidence-based guidelines is to present a consensus position from members of the Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (Società Italiana Unitaria di Colon-Proctologia, SIUCP) on the diagnosis and management of hemorrhoidal disease, with the goal of guiding physicians in the choice of the best treatment option. A panel of experts was charged by the Board of the SIUCP to develop key questions on the main topics related to the management of hemorrhoidal disease and to perform an accurate and comprehensive literature search on each topic, in order to provide evidence-based answers to the questions and to summarize them in statements. All the clinical questions were discussed by the expert panel in multiple rounds through the Delphi approach and, for each statement, a consensus among the experts was reached. The questions were created according to PICO (patients, intervention, comparison, and outcomes) criteria, and the statements were developed adopting the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) methodology. In cases of grade 1 hemorrhoidal prolapse, outpatient procedures including hemorrhoidal laser procedure and sclerotherapy may be considered the preferred surgical options. For grade 2 prolapse, nonexcisional procedures including outpatient treatments, hemorrhoidal artery ligation and mucopexy, laser hemorrhoidoplasty, the Rafaelo procedure, and stapled hemorrhoidopexy may represent the first-line treatment options, whereas excisional surgery may be considered in selected cases. In cases of grades 3 and 4, stapled hemorrhoidopexy and hemorrhoidectomy may represent the most effective procedures, even if, in the expert panel opinion, stapled hemorrhoidopexy represents the gold-standard treatment for grade 3 hemorrhoidal prolapse.Keywords
This publication has 272 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-term Outcomes of Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy vs Conventional HemorrhoidectomyArchives of Surgery, 2009
- Phlebotonics for haemorrhoids2008
- Conventional versus LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy for patients with symptomatic Hemorrhoids.2007
- Laxatives for the treatment of hemorrhoids.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2005
- Rubber band ligation versus excisional haemorrhoidectomy for haemorrhoids2004
- Stapled vs Excision HemorrhoidectomyArchives of Surgery, 2002
- Haemorrhoids: Pathology, pathophysiology and aetiologyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1994
- Haemorrhoids are associated not with hypertrophy of the internal anal sphincter, but with hypertension of the anal cushionsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1992
- A prospective study of the effect of haemorrhoidectomy on sphincter function and faecal continenceBritish Journal of Surgery, 1982
- The nature of haemorrhoidsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1975