Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Test Performance for Ototoxicity Monitoring
- 1 February 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Ear & Hearing
- Vol. 32 (1) , 61-74
Abstract
Introduction: A nonbehavioral method for monitoring ototoxicity in patients treated with cisplatin is needed because patients enduring chemotherapy may not be well or cooperative enough to undergo repeated hearing tests. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) provide a nonbehavioral measure of auditory function that is sensitive to cisplatin exposure. However, interpreting DPOAE findings in the context of ototoxicity monitoring requires that their accuracy be determined in relation to a clinically accepted gold standard test. Objectives: Among patients receiving cisplatin for the treatment of cancer, we sought to (1) identify the combination of DPOAE metrics and ototoxicity risk factors that best classified ears with and without ototoxic-induced hearing changes; and (2) evaluate the test performance achieved by the composite measure as well as by DPOAEs alone. Design: Odds of experiencing hearing changes at a given patient visit were determined using data collected prospectively from 24 Veterans receiving cisplatin. Pure-tone thresholds were examined within an octave of each subject's high-frequency hearing limit. DPOAE were collected as a set of four response growth (input/output) functions near the highest f2 frequency that yielded a robust response at L2 = L1 = 65 dB SPL. Logistic regression modeled the risk of hearing change using several DPOAE metrics, drug treatment factors, and other patient factors as independent variables. An optimal discriminant function was derived by reducing the model so that only statistically significant variables were included. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to evaluate test performance. Results: At higher cisplatin doses, ears with better hearing at baseline were more likely to exhibit ototoxic hearing changes than those with poorer hearing. Measures of pre-exposure hearing, cumulative drug dose, and DPOAEs generated a highly accurate discriminant function with a cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.9. DPOAEs alone also provided an indication of ototoxic hearing change when measured at the highest DPOAE test frequency that yielded a robust response. Conclusions: DPOAEs alone and especially in combination with pre-exposure hearing and cisplatin dose provide an indication of whether or not hearing has changed as a result of cisplatin administration. These promising results need to be validated in a separate sample.Keywords
This publication has 74 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evidence for basal distortion-product otoacoustic emission componentsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2010
- Steep and shallow phase gradient distortion product otoacoustic emissions arising basal to the primary tonesThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2009
- Factors Affecting Sensitivity of Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions to Ototoxic Hearing LossEar & Hearing, 2008
- Influence of in situ, sound-level calibration on distortion-product otoacoustic emission variabilityThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2008
- Toxicity of platinum compoundsExpert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, 2003
- Third Place—Resident Clinical Science Award 1998: Effects of Cis‐Platinum Chemotherapy on Otoacoustic Emissions: The Development of an Objective Screening ProtocolOtolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 1999
- Ototoxicity of low- and moderate-dose cisplatinCancer, 1985
- Ototoxicity of cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II): Influence of dose, schedule and mode of administrationEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1983
- Drug-induced OtotoxicityDrugs, 1980
- A system for evaluating auditory function from 8000–20 000 HzThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1979