Abstract
Interprofessional education (IPE) benefits are well-established, yet methods for implementing such programs vary greatly. This study compares infrastructure, curriculum, evaluation procedures, and insights from over a decade of IPE implementation at two institutions. Both saw evolution of common curriculum frameworks and evaluation metrics. However, a centralized administrative approach outperformed a grassroots approach for developing capacity for IPE uptake, as indicated by higher scores on the Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) Institutional Assessment Instrument. These experiences facilitated formation of a statewide IPE consortium. The authors urge others to consider these findings when implementing IPE curricula, contributing to the collective knowledge base on effective IPE models.

This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit: