How employees respond to personal offense: The effects of blame attribution, victim status, and offender status on revenge and reconciliation in the workplace.
Authors:
- Karl AquinoKAKarl Aquino
- Thomas M. TrippTTThomas M. Tripp
- Robert J. BiesRBRobert J. Bies
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Applied Psychology
- Vol. 86 (1) , 52-59
Abstract
This study investigated the relationships between blame, victim and offender status, and the pursuit of revenge or reconciliation after a personal offense. Results from a sample of 141 government agency employees showed that blame is positively related to revenge and negatively related to reconciliation. In addition, victim-offender relative status moderated the relation between blame and revenge such that victims who blamed sought revenge more often when the offender's status was lower than their own. The victims' own absolute hierarchical status also moderated this relation such that lower, not higher, status employees who blamed sought revenge more often.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1997
- Willingness to sacrifice in close relationships.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997
- Organization-Motivated Aggression: A Research FrameworkAcademy of Management Review, 1996
- Revenge and conflict escalationNegotiation Journal, 1993
- ForgivenessEthics, 1988
- Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and ProspectsJournal of Management, 1986
- The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . .Law & Society Review, 1981
- The Wisconsin evaluation projectNew Directions for Institutional Research, 1981
- The defendant's dilemma: Effects of jurors' attitudes and authoritarianism on judicial decisions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973
- Power-Dependence RelationsAmerican Sociological Review, 1962