Outcomes of Older Women With Hormone Receptor–Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor–Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated With a CDK4/6 Inhibitor and an Aromatase Inhibitor: An FDA Pooled Analysis
Authors:
- 20 December 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 37 (36) , 3475-3483
Abstract
PURPOSE: Many older women will be treated with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor and an aromatase inhibitor (AI), given US Food and Drug Administration approval of three agents in this class. The current pooled analysis examines the efficacy and safety of this combination in older women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We pooled data from three randomized controlled studies (N = 1,827) of different CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with an AI for initial treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative metastatic breast cancer. The effect of age on progression-free survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and a Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: For patients age 75 years or older (n = 198) who were treated with a CDK4/6 inhibitor and an AI, hazard ratio was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.31 to 0.76) with an estimated median progression-free survival of 31.1 months (95% CI, 20.2 months to not reached) versus 13.7 months (95% CI, 10.9 months to 24.9 months) for those treated with an AI. Incidence of grade 3 to 4 adverse events was 88.8% in patients age 75 years and older and 73.4% in patients younger than age 75 years. Patients age 75 years or older reported a decline in quality-of-life measures using the EQ-5D regardless of treatment with AI alone or with the addition of a CDK4/6 inhibitor. CONCLUSION: There was similar efficacy with a CDK4/6 inhibitor in combination with an AI compared with AI alone for first-line treatment of hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative metastatic breast cancer in older women compared with younger patients. Patients older than age 75 years experienced higher rates of toxicity, dose modifications, and a decrease from baseline in quality-of-life measures.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Broadening Eligibility Criteria to Make Clinical Trials More Representative: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Friends of Cancer Research Joint Research StatementJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2017
- Modernizing Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria: Recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology–Friends of Cancer Research Organ Dysfunction, Prior or Concurrent Malignancy, and Comorbidities Working GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2017
- Estimation of the Number of Women Living with Metastatic Breast Cancer in the United StatesCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2017
- Enrollment of older adults on oncology trials: An FDA perspectiveJournal of Geriatric Oncology, 2017
- Reevaluating Eligibility Criteria — Balancing Patient Protection and Participation in Oncology TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2017
- Accrual of Older Patients With Breast Cancer to Alliance Systemic Therapy Trials Over Time: Protocol A151527Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2017
- US Incidence of Breast Cancer Subtypes Defined by Joint Hormone Receptor and HER2 StatusJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2014
- Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)Quality of Life Research, 2011
- Quality-of-life in elderly patients with cancer: A short reviewEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2007
- EQ-SD: a measure of health status from the EuroQol GroupAnnals of Medicine, 2001