Stool Processing Methods for Xpert Ultra Testing in Childhood Tuberculosis: A Prospective, Multicountry Accuracy Study
- 3 June 2025
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 82 (3) , 526-534
Abstract
Background: Centrifuge-free processing methods support stool Xpert Ultra testing for childhood tuberculosis, but data on their accuracy, acceptability, and usability are limited. Methods: We conducted a prospective evaluation of stool Xpert Ultra in India, South Africa, and Uganda with 3 methods: the Stool Processing Kit (SPK), the Simple One-Step method (SOS), and the Optimized Sucrose Flotation method (OSF). Children <15 years old with presumptive tuberculosis underwent sputum testing with Xpert Ultra and culture. We compared the accuracy of each method against a microbiological reference standard (tuberculosis if Xpert Ultra or culture positive) and a composite reference standard (tuberculosis if confirmed or unconfirmed tuberculosis). We surveyed laboratory staff to assess the acceptability and usability of the methods. Results: We included 607 children, with a median age of 3.5 years (interquartile range, 1.3–7 years); 15.5% were human immunodeficiency virus positive. Against the microbiological reference standard, the sensitivities of SPK, SOS, and OSF were 36.9% (95% confidence interval, 28.6%–45.8%), 38.6% (17.2%–51.0%), and 31.3% (20.2%–44.1%), respectively, and the specificities, 98.2% (96.4%–99.3%), 97.3% (93.7%–99.1%), and 97.1% (93.3%–99%). The methods were acceptable and usable, but SOS was reported as most feasible to implement in a peripheral facility. Across methods, sensitivities increased among children who were culture positive (range, 55.0%–77.3%) and were low (13%–16.7%) against the composite reference standard. Adding stool Xpert Ultra increased sensitivity from 0% (OSF) to 11.8% (SPK/SOS), compared with sputum alone. Conclusions: Stool processing methods for Xpert Ultra were acceptable and usable and performed similarly, with highest sensitivity among children with culture-positive tuberculosis.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U01AI152087)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI131617)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL153581)
- National Institutes of Health
- FIND
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Performance of stool-based molecular tests and processing methods for paediatric tuberculosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysisThe Lancet Microbe, 2024
- Stool CBNAAT: Alternative tool in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in childrenIndian Journal of Tuberculosis, 2023
- Use of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay on stool and gastric aspirate samples to diagnose pulmonary tuberculosis in children in a high-tuberculosis-burden but resource-limited area of ChinaInternational Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2022
- The Simple One-Step (SOS) Stool Processing Method for Use with the Xpert MTB/RIF Assay for a Child-Friendly Diagnosis of Tuberculosis Closer to the Point of CareJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2021
- Sensitive and Feasible Specimen Collection and Testing Strategies for Diagnosing Tuberculosis in Young ChildrenJAMA Pediatrics, 2021
- A Prospective Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for Childhood Pulmonary Tuberculosis in UgandaJournal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, 2021
- Laboratory development of a simple stool sample processing method diagnosis of pediatric tuberculosis using Xpert UltraTuberculosis, 2020
- Xpert Ultra Assay on Stool to Diagnose Pulmonary Tuberculosis in ChildrenClinical Infectious Diseases, 2020
- Clinical Case Definitions for Classification of Intrathoracic Tuberculosis in Children: An UpdateClinical Infectious Diseases, 2015
- Rapid Diagnosis of Pediatric Intrathoracic Tuberculosis From Stool Samples Using the Xpert MTB/RIF AssayThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 2012