Comparative evaluation of immiscible, near miscible and miscible CO2 huff-n-puff to enhance oil recovery from a single matrix–fracture system (experimental and simulation studies)
Authors:
- F. TorabiFTF. Torabi
- A. Qazvini FirouzAFA. Qazvini Firouz
- A. KavousiAKA. Kavousi
- K. AsghariKAK. Asghari
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of operating pressure, matrix permeability and connate water saturation on performance of CO2 huff-and-puff process in matrix-fracture experimental modelFuel, 2010
- Laboratory Experimental Results of Huff ‘n’ Puff CO2 Flooding in a Fractured Core System2007
- Laboratory Experiments of Tertiary CO2 Injection Into a Fractured Core2006
- Screening Criteria for Carbon Dioxide Huff ‘n’ Puff Operations2006
- A parametric investigation of the cyclic CO2 injection processJournal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 1995
- Light Oil Recovery From Cyclic CO2 Injection: Influence of Low Pressures, Impure CO2, and Reservoir GasSPE Reservoir Engineering, 1991
- Light Oil Recovery from Cyclic CO2 Injection: Influence of Gravity Segregation and Remaining Oil1990
- Design and Results of a Shallow, Light Oilfield-Wide Application of CO2 Huff `n' Puff Process1990
- CO2 Huff-Puff Simulation Using a Compositional Reservoir Simulator1986
- A Study of the Vaporization of Crude Oil by Carbon Dioxide RepressuringJournal of Petroleum Technology, 1963