Users' relevance criteria for evaluating answers in a social Q&A site
Top Cited Papers
- 29 January 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
- Vol. 60 (4) , 716-727
Abstract
This study examines the criteria questioners use to select the best answers in a social Q&A site (Yahoo! Answers) within the theoretical framework of relevance research. A social Q&A site is a novel environment where people voluntarily ask and answer questions. In Yahoo! Answers, the questioner selects the answer that best satisfies his or her question and leaves comments on it. Under the assumption that the comments reflect the reasons why questioners select particular answers as the best, this study analyzed 2,140 comments collected from Yahoo! Answers during December 2007. The content analysis identified 23 individual relevance criteria in six classes: Content, Cognitive, Utility, Information Sources, Extrinsic, and Socioemotional. A major finding is that the selection criteria used in a social Q&A site have considerable overlap with many relevance criteria uncovered in previous relevance studies, but that the scope of socio‐emotional criteria has been expanded to include the social aspect of this environment. Another significant finding is that the relative importance of individual criteria varies according to topic categories. Socioemotional criteria are popular in discussion‐oriented categories, content‐oriented criteria in topic‐oriented categories, and utility criteria in self‐help categories. This study generalizes previous relevance studies to a new environment by going beyond an academic setting.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: nature and manifestations of relevanceJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007
- Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part III: Behavior and effects of relevanceJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007
- Assessing aesthetic relevance: Children's book selection in a digital libraryJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007
- Usability and effectiveness evaluation of a course‐advising chat botProceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007
- Relevance judgment in epistemic and hedonic information searchesJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006
- User‐defined relevance criteria in web searchingJournal of Documentation, 2006
- The concept of relevance in IRJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2003
- User perspectives on relevance criteria: A comparison among relevant, partially relevant, and not‐relevant judgmentsJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2002
- The Nature of Relevance in Information Retrieval: An Empirical StudyThe Library Quarterly, 1993
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960