A Phase II Study of Gemcitabine and Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Cancer
Authors:
- Peter J. Van VeldhuizenPVPeter J. Van Veldhuizen
- Michael HusseyMHMichael Hussey
- Primo N. Jr LaraPLPrimo N. Jr Lara
- Philip C. MackPMPhilip C. Mack
- Regina Gandour-EdwardsRGRegina Gandour-Edwards
- Joseph I. ClarkJCJoseph I. Clark
- Marianne K. LangeMLMarianne K. Lange
- David E. CrawfordDCDavid E. Crawford
- 1 October 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in American Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 32 (5) , 453-459
Abstract
Objectives: Gemcitabine plus capecitabine has moderate efficacy in patients with advanced renal cell cancer (RCC) but has considerable toxicity. We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of a modified dose-schedule of this doublet in patients with metastatic RCC. Methods: Chemotherapy-naive patients were treated with gemcitabine at 900 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 and with capecitabine at 625 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1 through 21, and every 28 days thereafter. The primary end point was response rate (RR). No further evaluation of this regimen would be pursued if the RR was ≤5%. In an exploratory analysis, we also evaluated potential markers of prognosis and treatment response, including thymidylate synthase, PTEN, pAKT, pmTOR, XRCC1, and ERCC1. Results: Of 43 patients, 1 was ineligible and 2 were not analyzable. There was 1 complete response and 3 partial responses, for an overall RR of 10% (95% CI = 3, 24). Nineteen patients (48%) had stable disease. The 6-month freedom-from-treatment-failure and overall survival rates were 20% (95% CI = 8, 32) and 75% (95% CI = 62, 88), respectively. Median survival time was 23 months (95% CI = 10, 37). One patient each experienced grade 4 neutropenia, fatigue, thrombocytopenia, and hemolysis with renal failure. The most common grade 3 toxicities were neutropenia (12 patients), fatigue (5), and leucopenia (4). Patients with a best response of stable disease or better were more likely to have decreased expression of PTEN and increased expression of pmTOR. Conclusions: Gemcitabine plus capecitabine at this reduced dose-schedule benefits a small percentage of patients with RCC with an acceptable toxicity profile.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer Statistics, 2008CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2008
- In ReplyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- A phase II study of gemcitabine and capecitabine in metastatic renal cancerCancer, 2006
- Pharmacogenomics and gemcitabineAnnals of Oncology, 2006
- A Phase I trial of fixed dose rate gemcitabine and capecitabine in metastatic renal cell carcinomaCancer, 2005
- Abnormalities of apoptotic and cell cycle regulatory proteins in distinct histopathologic components of benign prostatic hyperplasiaProstate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2004
- Capecitabine monotherapy and in combination with immunotherapy in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinomaAnti-Cancer Drugs, 2003
- Expression of PTEN in renal cell carcinoma and its relation to tumor behavior and growthJournal of Surgical Oncology, 2003
- Elevated Akt Activation and Its Impact on Clinicopathological Features of Renal Cell CarcinomaJournal of Urology, 2003
- New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid TumorsJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000