Comparing clinical tests of visual function in cataract with the patient's perceived visual disability
Authors:
- 1 September 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Eye
- Vol. 4 (5) , 712-717
Abstract
Conventional techniques for assessing the visual function of cataract patients include visual acuity (VA), contrast sensitivity (CS) and glare disability (GD). The extent to which these measurements provide accurate information about a patient's perceived visual disability is not known. In this study, binocular and monocular VA and CS and monocular GD measurements were made using commercially available techniques on 33 cataract patients. VA was measured using a Ferris-Bailey LogMAR chart and CS by the Pelli-Robson letter CS chart. Glare disability was measured using the Mentor Brightness Acuity Tester in conjunction with both the LogMAR and Pelli Robson charts. Each patient's perceived visual disability was quantified using a 20-point questionnaire about the effect of vision on everyday activities. There was little correlation between subjective visual disability and monocular or binocular VA measurements. Measurements of binocular CS, however, were highly correlated with the patient's perceived visual disability, particularly their subjective assessment of the effect of vision on their mobility-orientation. We suggest that binocular CS measurements using the Pelli-Robson chart provide useful additional information regarding the need for surgery in cataract patients.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Binocular contrast sensitivity with monocular glare disabilityOphthalmic and Physiological Optics, 1990
- The reliability of the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chartOphthalmic and Physiological Optics, 1990
- Contrast sensitivity in macular degeneration and the relation to subjective visual impairmentActa Ophthalmologica, 1989
- The use of accurate visual acuity measurements in clinical anti‐cataract formulation trialsOphthalmic and Physiological Optics, 1988
- Contrast sensitivity, acuity, and the perception of 'real-world' targets.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1987
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Contrast Sensitivity Function as a Diagnostic Tool in Low VisionOptometry and Vision Science, 1985
- Contrast sensitivity and visual disability in chronic simple glaucoma.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1984
- Visual Factors and Orientation-Mobility PerformanceOptometry and Vision Science, 1982
- A CHANGE IN INDICATIONS FOR CATARACT SURGERY? A 10 YEAR COMPARATIVE EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDYActa Ophthalmologica, 1981