Effectiveness of Pedagogical Tools for Teaching Medical Gross Anatomy During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Authors:
- 24 February 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Medical Science Educator
- Vol. 32 (2) , 411-422
Abstract
Medical institutions have been forced to modify gross anatomy pedagogy to comply with the health restrictions imposed by the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Boston University School of Medicine (BUSM) is one such institution that temporarily restructured its course. We replaced cadaveric dissection activities with prosections and placed a greater emphasis on a flipped classroom model. This study investigates the effectiveness of new course materials developed to aid these curriculum changes. Course materials were developed for three purposes: (1) preparation before laboratory sessions (orientation videos and Complete Anatomy (3D4Medical, Elsevier) screens); (2) guidance during laboratory sessions (laboratory guides); and (3) review after laboratory sessions (Zoom recitation sessions). We performed a grounded theory thematic analysis of students’ responses (80/160, 50% response) to qualitative survey questions and to focus group questions (16 students who self-selected between 4 different sessions). Data from both the survey and focus groups demonstrated that the vast majority of students agreed that the materials helped them navigate through learning gross anatomy. However, laboratory guides were used mostly for post-lab review as opposed to the intended direction during laboratory sessions. Students within all focus groups overwhelmingly touted the value of Zoom recitation sessions, with many stating that they were imperative to course success. When comparing performance data between 2019 (pre-COVID) and 2020 students, we found that the students who took the anatomy course during the onset of COVID had a slightly higher overall average score in all three modules of the course than compared to the 2019 students. We propose that the utilization of course materials that students perceived as time saving and pertinent to their exam performance, when combined with cadaveric prosection, emphasized the benefits of flipped-classroom learning to help students learn gross anatomy effectively and efficiently during the pandemic and beyond.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Students' perception of anatomy education at a Korean medical college with respect to time and contentsAnatomy & Cell Biology, 2013
- Meeting the Family: Promoting Humanism in Gross AnatomyTeaching and Learning in Medicine, 2012
- Student perception of a new integrated anatomy practical program: Does students' prior learning make a difference?Clinical Anatomy, 2011
- The influence of prior knowledge on the retrieval‐directed function of note taking in prior knowledge activationBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 2011
- Medical education in the anatomical sciences: The winds of change continue to blowAnatomical Sciences Education, 2009
- Anatomy in a Modern Medical CurriculumThe Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2007
- Attitudes of professional anatomists to curricular changeClinical Anatomy, 2005
- New path for teaching anatomy: Living anatomy and medical imaging vs. dissectionThe Anatomical Record Part B: The New Anatomist, 2004
- Prosection vs. dissection, the debate continues: Rebuttal to GrangerThe Anatomical Record Part B: The New Anatomist, 2004
- Learning human anatomy: by dissection or from prosections?Medical Education, 1990