External Ventricular Drains and Infection Risk: Duration as the Dominant Predictor—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Open Access
- 15 May 2026
- journal article
- review article
- Published by MDPI AG in Brain Sciences
- Vol. 16 (5) , 528
Abstract
Background/Objectives: External ventricular drains (EVDs) are widely used in the management of intracranial hemorrhage and hydrocephalus; however, they carry a significant risk of device-related central nervous system infections, including ventriculitis and meningitis, which are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and prolonged intensive care stays. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate whether prolonged EVD duration (>10 days) is associated with an increased risk of ventriculostomy-related infection compared with shorter duration (≤10 days), and to explore the association with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak where data were available. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL was performed from database inception through September 2025, including English-language clinical trials, cohort studies, and case–control studies reporting infection outcomes related to EVD management factors. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Sixteen studies comprising approximately 5500 patients met the inclusion criteria. Shorter EVD duration (≤10 days) was associated with a significantly lower risk of infection (pooled OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.30–0.68; p = 0.0002), corresponding to a 55% reduction in the odds of ventriculostomy-related infection. Prolonged EVD duration was consistently associated with increased infection risk across studies. Conclusions:These findings suggest that minimizing EVD duration may reduce infection risk and support early removal when clinically feasible. However, given the observational nature of the included studies, the results should be interpreted with caution. Further research is warranted to evaluate additional modifiable risk factors, including CSF leakage and sampling practices.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risk factors for infection associated with the use of external ventricular drainage: a systematic review with meta-analysisJournal of Hospital Infection, 2024
- Comparative study between ventriculosubgaleal shunt and external ventricular drain for management of post infective hydrocephalus among pediatricsChild's Nervous System, 2024
- Heparin-binding protein as a marker of ventriculostomy related infection and central nervous system inflammation in neuro-intensive careClinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 2023
- PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open SynthesisCampbell Systematic Reviews, 2022
- Risk factors for meningitis in neurosurgical patients with cerebrospinal fluid drains: prospective observational cohort studyActa Neurochirurgica, 2019
- Incidence, depth, and severity of surgical site infections after neurosurgical interventionsActa Neurochirurgica, 2018
- Recurrent sampling and ventriculostomy-associated infections: a case-control studyActa Neurochirurgica, 2018
- External ventricular drain placement in the intensive care unit versus operating room: Evaluation of complications and accuracyClinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 2015
- Assessment of the in vivo formation of biofilm on external ventricular drainagesEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2013
- Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analysesEuropean Journal of Epidemiology, 2010