Aboriginal experiences of cancer and care coordination: Lessons from the Cancer Data and Aboriginal Disparities (CanDAD) narratives
Authors:
- Rachel ReillyRRRachel Reilly
- Jasmine MicklemJMJasmine Micklem
- Janet StajicJSJanet Stajic
- Marion EckertMEMarion Eckert
- Alex BrownABAlex Brown
- the other CanDAD Investigators and the CanDAD Aboriginal Community Reference GroupTGthe other CanDAD Investigators and the CanDAD Aboriginal Community Reference Group
Open Access
- 24 April 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Health Expectations
- Vol. 21 (5) , 927-936
Abstract
Background: Aboriginal people with cancer experience worse outcomes than other Australians for a range of complex and interrelated reasons. A younger age at diagnosis, higher likelihood of more advanced cancer or cancer type with poorer prognosis, geographic isolation and cultural and language diversity mean that patient pathways are potentially more complex for Aboriginal people with cancer. In addition, variation in the quality and acceptability of care may influence cancer outcomes.Objective: This study sought to understand how care coordination influences Aboriginal people's experiences of cancer treatment.Methods: Interviews with 29 Aboriginal patients or cancer survivors, 11 carers and 22 service providers were carried out. Interviews were semi‐structured and sought to elicit experiences of cancer and the health‐care system. The manifest content of the cancer narratives was entered onto a cancer pathway mapping tool and underlying themes were identified inductively.Results: The practice of cancer care coordination was found to address the needs of Aboriginal patients and their families/carers in 4 main areas: “navigating the health system”; “information and communication”; “things to manage at home”; and “cultural safety”.Conclusions: The CanDAD findings indicate that, when the need for cancer care coordination is met, it facilitated continuity of care in a range of ways that may potentially improve cancer outcomes. However, the need remains unmet for many. Findings support the importance of dedicated care coordination to enable Aboriginal people to receive adequate and appropriate patient‐centred care, so that the unacceptable disparity in cancer outcomes between Aboriginal and non‐Aboriginal people can be addressed.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1072243)
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Disparities in cancer stage at diagnosis and survival of Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal South AustraliansCancer Epidemiology, 2017
- Cancer Data and Aboriginal Disparities (CanDAD)—developing an Advanced Cancer Data System for Aboriginal people in South Australia: a mixed methods research protocolBMJ Open, 2016
- Improving outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with cancer requires a systematic approach to understanding patients’ experiences of careAustralian Health Review, 2016
- Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transitionThe Lancet, 2015
- The role of patient navigators in eliminating health disparitiesCancer, 2011
- ‘Nowhere to room … nobody told them’: logistical and cultural impediments to Aboriginal peoples’ participation in cancer treatmentAustralian Health Review, 2011
- Patients’ experiences with navigation for cancer carePatient Education and Counseling, 2010
- Establishing a Patient Navigator Program to Reduce Cancer Disparities in the American Indian Communities of Western South Dakota: Initial Observations and ResultsCancer Control, 2008
- Supporting cancer control for Indigenous Australians: initiatives and challenges for cancer councilsAustralian Health Review, 2008
- Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.2001