The accuracy of magnifying narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) in distinguishing between cancerous and noncancerous gastric lesions
Authors:
- Liucheng WuLWLiucheng Wu
- Mingwei HuangMHMingwei Huang
- Qinwen JinQJQinwen Jin
- Yuzhou QinYQYuzhou Qin
- Jiansi ChenJCJiansi Chen
Open Access
- 1 March 2018
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medicine
- Vol. 97 (9) , e9780
Abstract
Previous clinical trials have demonstrated the diagnostic accuracy of magnifying narrow-band (ME-NBI) for gastric cancerous lesions, but the results are inconsistent. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to investigate the accuracy of ME-NBI in distinguishing between cancerous and noncancerous gastric lesions. Systematic literature searches were conducted until October 2016 in PubMed, Embase by 2 independent reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity. Two authors independently evaluated studies for inclusion, rated methodological quality, and abstracted relevant data. Meta-analytic method was used to construct summary receiver operating characteristic curves, and pooled sensitivity, specificity were calculated. Nine studies enrolling 5398 lesions were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity were 88% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78–93%), 96% (95% CI: 91–98%), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.97. There was a large heterogeneity between the included studies. Studies with lesions ≤ 10 mm still had a high pooled sensitivity of 81% (95% CI: 73–90%) and specificity of 97% (95% CI: 95–100%). Studies which analyzed resected specimens had a sensitivity of 91% (95 CI: 82–99%) and specificity of 88% (95% CI: 83–94%), and studies which analyzed biopsied specimens had a sensitivity of 85% (95 CI: 74–96%) and specificity of 99% (95% CI: 98–99%). ME-NBI is highly accurate and consistent to distinguish between gastric cancerous and noncancerous lesions.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy StudiesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2011
- Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging achieves superior accuracy in the differential diagnosis of superficial gastric lesions identified with white-light endoscopy: a prospective studyGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2010
- Diagnostic accuracy of narrow-band imaging and pit pattern analysis significantly improved for less-experienced endoscopists after an expanded training programGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2010
- Magnifying endoscopy for diagnosing and delineating early gastric cancerEndoscopy, 2009
- Potential and present limitation of endocytoscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma: a multicenter ex vivo pilot studyGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2007
- The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessedJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2005
- Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Early Cancers of the Upper Gastrointestinal TractJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Magnifying Endoscopy Combined with Narrow Band Imaging System for Early Gastric Cancer: Correlation of Vascular Pattern with Histopathology (including video)Endoscopy, 2004
- Novel magnified endoscopic findings of microvascular architecture in intramucosal gastric cancerGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2002
- Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary roc curve: Data‐analytic approaches and some additional considerationsStatistics in Medicine, 1993