Impact of patient training patterns on peritonitis rates in a large national cohort study
Authors:
- Ana Elizabeth FigueiredoAFAna Elizabeth Figueiredo
- Thyago Proença de MoraesTMThyago Proença de Moraes
- Pasqual BarrettiPBPasqual Barretti
- Roberto Pecoits-FilhoRPRoberto Pecoits-Filho
- on behalf of the BRAZPD InvestigatorsOIon behalf of the BRAZPD Investigators
- 8 September 2014
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
- Vol. 30 (1) , 137-142
Abstract
Background Ideal training methods that could ensure best peritoneal dialysis (PD) outcome have not been defined in previous reports. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of training characteristics on peritonitis rates in a large Brazilian cohort. Methods Incident patients with valid data on training recruited in the Brazilian Peritoneal Dialysis Multicenter Study (BRAZPD II) from January 2008 to January 2011 were included. Peritonitis was diagnosed according to International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis guidelines; incidence rate of peritonitis (episodes/patient-months) and time to the first peritonitis were used as end points. Results Two thousand two hundred and forty-three adult patients were included in the analysis: 59 ± 16 years old, 51.8% female, 64.7% with ≤4 years of education. The median training time was 15 h (IQI 10–20 h). Patients were followed for a median of 11.2 months (range 3–36.5). The overall peritonitis rate was 0.29 per year at risk (1 episode/41 patient-months). The mean number of hours of training per day was 1.8 ± 2.4. Less than 1 h of training/day was associated with higher incidence rate when compared with the intervals of 1–2 h/day (P = 0.03) and >2 h/day (P = 0.02). Patients who received a cumulative training of >15 h had significantly lower incidence of peritonitis compared with 10 days after implantation (0.23 per year). More experienced centers had a lower risk for the first peritonitis (P = 0.003). Conclusions This is the first study to analyze the association between training characteristics and outcomes in a large cohort of PD patients. Low training time (particularly <15 h), smaller center size and the timing of training in relation to catheter implantation were associated with a higher incidence of peritonitis. These results support the recommendation of a minimum amount of training hours to reduce peritonitis incidence regardless of the number of hours trained per day.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Advanced Nursing Experience is Beneficial for Lowering the Peritonitis Rate in Patients on Peritoneal DialysisPeritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis, 2012
- ISPD Position Statement on Reducing the Risks of Peritoneal Dialysis–Related InfectionsPeritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis, 2011
- Geographic and Educational Factors and Risk of the First Peritonitis Episode in Brazilian Peritoneal Dialysis Study (BRAZPD) PatientsClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2011
- Peritoneal dialysis practice in Australia and New Zealand: A call to actionNephrology, 2010
- Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Infections Recommendations: 2010 UpdatePeritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis, 2010
- Impact of the Bag Exchange Procedure on Risk of PeritonitisPeritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis, 2010
- Influence of Peritoneal Dialysis Training Nurses' Experience on Peritonitis RatesClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2007
- Prevention of infectious complications in peritoneal dialysis: best demonstrated practicesKidney International, 2006
- Peritoneal dialysis in the US: Evaluation of outcomes in contemporary cohortsKidney International, 2006
- Patient education: can it maximize the success of therapy?Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2001