Second‐line cetuximab/irinotecan versus oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidines for metastatic colorectal cancer with wild‐type KRAS
Authors:
Open Access
- 9 January 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Cancer Science
- Vol. 104 (4) , 473-480
Abstract
The goal of the present study was to compare the efficacy of the combination of cetuximab and irinotecan to the combination of oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidines as second‐line chemotherapy in patients with irinotecan‐refractory and oxaliplatin‐naïve metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) harboring wild‐type KRAS. The study included 120 patients with mCRC who had progressed after irinotecan‐containing first‐line chemotherapy and were never treated with oxaliplatin; 40 patients with wild‐type KRAS were accrued prospectively in the experimental arm (arm A), and 80 patients accrued retrospectively were divided into control arms B (n = 46) and C (n = 34) according to KRAS genotype. Second‐line treatments consisted of cetuximab plus irinotecan for arm A, and oxaliplatin plus either 5‐fluorouracil (FOLFOX) or capecitabine (CapeOX) for the control arms. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 8.3, 5.8 and 3.9 months, for arms A, B and C, respectively, with statistical significance favoring arm A (P = 0.007). Differences in overall survival did not reach statistical significance (18.3 vs 12.6 vs 12.9, P = 0.138), although there was a trend toward longer overall survival in arm A. In terms of benefit from oxaliplatin‐containing regimens either as second‐line or third‐line therapy, the median PFS was 5.0 months in arms B and C as second‐line therapy, and 4.0 months in arm A as third‐line therapy, with no statistical significance (P = 0.385). Second‐line cetuximab plus irinotecan is a valid treatment strategy for mCRC patients with irinotecan‐refractory and oxaliplatin‐naïve tumors harboring wild‐type KRAS. Oxaliplatin‐containing chemotherapy resulted in equivalent PFS both as a second‐line and a third‐line therapy, enabling delay of the administration of FOLFOX and CapeOX until subsequent treatment cycles.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Continuation of bevacizumab after first progression in metastatic colorectal cancer (ML18147): a randomised phase 3 trialThe Lancet Oncology, 2013
- Chemotherapy options in elderly and frail patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MRC FOCUS2): an open-label, randomised factorial trialThe Lancet, 2011
- Capecitabine, Bevacizumab, and Mitomycin in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results of the Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group Randomized Phase III MAX StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- Safety and efficacy of first-line bevacizumab with FOLFOX, XELOX, FOLFIRI and fluoropyrimidines in metastatic colorectal cancer: the BEAT studyAnnals of Oncology, 2009
- Bevacizumab Beyond First Progression Is Associated With Prolonged Overall Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From a Large Observational Cohort Study (BRiTE)Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Bevacizumab in Combination With Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy As First-Line Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Phase III StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Different strategies of sequential and combination chemotherapy for patients with poor prognosis advanced colorectal cancer (MRC FOCUS): a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2007
- Randomised study of sequential versus combination chemotherapy with capecitabine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin in advanced colorectal cancer, an interim safety analysis. A Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) phase III studyAnnals of Oncology, 2006
- Bevacizumab plus Irinotecan, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin for Metastatic Colorectal CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- FOLFIRI Followed by FOLFOX6 or the Reverse Sequence in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized GERCOR StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004