Innovation in speech-language pathology research and writing: Transdisciplinary theoretical and ethical perspectives on cultural responsiveness
- 22 June 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
- Vol. 24 (5) , 460-471
Abstract
In this paper, we offer three paths for the development of innovation in speech-language pathology (SLP), which enhance the discipline’s capacity to address issues of diversity, inclusion and cultural responsiveness: transdisciplinary theoretical research, researcher reflexivity, and changes in ethical standards. First, we engage in a reflective conversation to identify facilitators and barriers to innovation we have encountered as academics who speak and write from personal and professional positionings that move between the privileged and the marginalised. Second, we present the results of a critical discourse analysis of the 2020 revisions to Speech Pathology Australia’s Code of Ethics and characterise recent changes in the field’s expanding understanding of ethical research and clinical practices. Third, we discuss how speech-language pathologists might reconsider their modes of engagement with clients and research populations in our shared area of specialisation—transgender voice. Together, these insights can support speech-language pathologists in further developing a contemporary, self-reflective, culturally humble and responsive professional culture.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cultural safety and the socioethical nurseNursing Ethics, 2010
- All of the above: New coalitions in sociocultural linguistics1Journal of Sociolinguistics, 2008
- Genre and academic writing in the disciplinesLanguage Teaching, 2008
- “The writing of this thesis was a process that I could not explore with the positivistic detachment of the classical sociologist”: Self and structure in New Humanities research thesesJournal of English for Academic Purposes, 2006
- The role of English in scientific communication: lingua franca or Tyrannosaurus rex?Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2004
- Confronting “Culture” in Medicineʼs “Culture of No Culture”Academic Medicine, 2003
- Critical Discourse AnalysisAnnual Review of Anthropology, 2000
- Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial PerspectiveFeminist Studies, 1988
- Qualitative research: An additional research methodology for speech pathology?International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 1988
- Cultural differences in the organization of academic textsJournal of Pragmatics, 1987