Cautionary comments regarding the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.
Author:
- David J. PittengerDPDavid J. Pittenger
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Consulting Psychology Journal
- Vol. 57 (3) , 210-221
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Test-Retest of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: An Examination of Dominant FunctioningEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1997
- The big five versus the big four: the relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and NEO-PI five factor model of personalityPersonality and Individual Differences, 1996
- The Cross-Disciplinary Ethical Responsibilities of Psychology FacultyEthics & Behavior, 1994
- The structure of phenotypic personality traits.American Psychologist, 1993
- The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure.Psychological Assessment, 1992
- An empirical evaluation of the MBTI typologyPersonality and Individual Differences, 1991
- Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator as a Measure of Sociability and ImpulsivityEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1988
- The Multifactorial Nature of Extraversion-Introversion in the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and Eysenck Personality InventoryEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1987
- Item Analysis of the Myers-Briggs Type IndicatorEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1985
- The Cost of DichotomizationApplied Psychological Measurement, 1983