Analysis of Uncertainty on Water Distribution Hydraulics and Water Quality
Authors:
- 1 July 2005
- conference paper
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
- p. 1-12
Abstract
Since the passage of the Safe drinking Water Act (SDWA) of 1990, researchers have been motivated to work on water quality and system hydraulics issues in water distribution system design and operation. Before 1990 water quality requirements were only imposed at the water source, thus, the primary concern of the water distribution system was systems hydraulics. Today maintaining disinfection levels and pressure are equally important. System modeling can be used as a basis of planning and operation decisions. However, model accuracy and uncertainty will impact the confidence in, thus the conservatism built into, model based decisions. Model prediction uncertainty results from uncertainty in model parameters that are determined through calibration or are based upon modeler judgment. Uncertainty in pressure head has been evaluated from the perspective of system reliability and in design. However, the relative impact of alternative data has not been compared to assess the need for estimating parameters. In addition, water quality within a distribution is strongly affected by the selection of water quality model parameters such as bulk and wall decay coefficients. In addition, since water quality is dominated by advective transport, hydraulic parameters and conditions also impact water quality. This is most clearly seen in the effects of tanks due to flows to and from the storage facility. The hydraulic system representation will also affect the flow distribution and travel times within the system. Many modelers suggest that all pipe models are required to adequately represent the true flow patterns. To date, only anecdotal evidence through analysis of simple networks under deterministic conditions has been presented justifying this conclusion. However, as more pipes are introduced, more uncertain parameters must be defined or calibrated for those components. This paper begins to examine the impact of alternative sources of uncertainty on water quality predictions by examining steady state conditions for a well-documented mid-sized system. The objective is to study the effect of alternative uncertain parameters sets on uncertainty levels of hydraulic and water quality variables through Monte Carlo simulation. The input parameters considered are the decay coefficients, pipe roughnesses, pipe diameters, and nodal demands. The output variables evaluated are the nodal pressure heads and concentrations are points throughout the system.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Two Approaches for the Least Cost Design of Water Distribution Systems Under Uncertain Demands2004
- Reliability-Based Optimal Design of Water Distribution NetworksJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 1999
- Modeling Chlorine Residuals in Drinking‐Water Distribution SystemsJournal of Environmental Engineering, 1994
- Model for Water Distribution System ReliabilityJournal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1990
- Water Distribution System Design Under UncertaintiesJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 1989
- Water Distribution Reliability: Simulation MethodsJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 1988
- Water Distribution Reliability: Analytical MethodsJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 1988