Natural language processing systems for extracting information from electronic health records about activities of daily living. A systematic review
Open Access
- 8 April 2024
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JAMIA Open
- Vol. 7 (2) , ooae044
Abstract
Objective: Natural language processing (NLP) can enhance research on activities of daily living (ADL) by extracting structured information from unstructured electronic health records (EHRs) notes. This review aims to give insight into the state-of-the-art, usability, and performance of NLP systems to extract information on ADL from EHRs. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was conducted based on searches in Pubmed, Embase, Cinahl, Web of Science, and Scopus. Studies published between 2017 and 2022 were selected based on predefined eligibility criteria. Results: The review identified 22 studies. Most studies (65%) used NLP for classifying unstructured EHR data on 1 or 2 ADL. Deep learning, combined with a ruled-based method or machine learning, was the approach most commonly used. NLP systems varied widely in terms of the pre-processing and algorithms. Common performance evaluation methods were cross-validation and train/test datasets, with F1, precision, and sensitivity as the most frequently reported evaluation metrics. Most studies reported relativity high overall scores on the evaluation metrics. Discussion: NLP systems are valuable for the extraction of unstructured EHR data on ADL. However, comparing the performance of NLP systems is difficult due to the diversity of the studies and challenges related to the dataset, including restricted access to EHR data, inadequate documentation, lack of granularity, and small datasets. Conclusion: This systematic review indicates that NLP is promising for deriving information on ADL from unstructured EHR notes. However, what the best-performing NLP system is, depends on characteristics of the dataset, research question, and type of ADL.Keywords
Funding Information
- Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Sports
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- Defining and Assessing Geriatric Risk Factors and Associated Health Care Utilization Among Older Adults Using Claims and Electronic Health RecordsMedical Care, 2018
- Comparing clinician descriptions of frailty and geriatric syndromes using electronic health records: a retrospective cohort studyBMC Geriatrics, 2017
- Natural language processing systems for capturing and standardizing unstructured clinical information: A systematic reviewJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2017
- Data integration of structured and unstructured sources for assigning clinical codes to patient staysJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2015
- A standardised graphic method for describing data privacy frameworks in primary care research using a flexible zone modelInternational Journal of Medical Informatics, 2014
- The Inevitable Application of Big Data to Health CareJAMA, 2013
- Multiple Chronic Conditions and Disabilities: Implications for Health Services Research and Data DemandsHealth Services Research, 2010
- A comparative review of the Katz ADL and the Barthel Index in assessing the activities of daily living of older peopleInternational Journal of Older People Nursing, 2007
- Karnofsky performance status revisited: reliability, validity, and guidelines.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1984
- Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosisNeurology, 1983