Real-world use of multigene signatures in early breast cancer: differences to clinical trials
Authors:
Open Access
- 24 January 2024
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Springer Nature in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
- Vol. 205 (1) , 39-48
Abstract
Purpose: In Italy, Lombardy was the first region to reimburse multigene assays (MGAs) for patients otherwise candidates for chemotherapy. This is a real-world experience of MGAs usage in six referral cancer centers in Lombardy. Methods: Among MGAs, Oncotype DX (RS) was used in 97% of cases. Consecutive patients tested with Oncotype DX from July 2020 to July 2022 were selected. The distribution of clinicopathologic features by RS groups (low RS: 0–25, high RS: 26–100) was assessed using chi-square and compared with those of the TAILORx and RxPONDER trials. Results: Out of 1,098 patients identified, 73% had low RS. Grade and Ki67 were associated with RS (p < 0.001). In patients with both G3 and Ki67 > 30%, 39% had low RS, while in patients with both G1 and Ki67 < 20%, 7% had high RS. The proportion of low RS in node-positive patients was similar to that in RxPONDER (82% vs 83%), while node-negative patients with low RS were significantly less than in TAILORx (66% vs 86%, p < 0.001). The distribution of Grade was different from registration trials, with more G3 and fewer G1 (38% and 3%) than in TAILORx (18% and 27%) and RxPONDER (10% and 24%) (p < 0.001). Patients ≤ 50 years were overrepresented in this series (41%) than in TAILORx and RxPONDER (31% and 24%, respectively) (p < 0.001) and, among them, 42% were node positive. Conclusions: In this real-world series, Oncotype DX was the test almost exclusively used. Despite reimbursement being linked to pre-test chemotherapy recommendation, almost 3/4 patients resulted in the low-RS group. The significant proportion of node-positive patients ≤ 50 years tested indicates that oncologists considered Oncotype DX informative also in this population.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- Exact Sciences
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- The impact of the 21-gene assay on adjuvant treatment decisions in oestrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer: a prospective studyBritish Journal of Cancer, 2016
- Outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in young breast cancer patients: a pooled analysis of individual patient data from eight prospectively randomized controlled trialsBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2015
- Prospective study of the impact of the Prosigna assay on adjuvant clinical decision-making in unselected patients with estrogen receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor negative, node negative early-stage breast cancerCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 2015
- The impact of the Oncotype Dx breast cancer assay in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysisBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2013
- Elucidating Prognosis and Biology of Breast Cancer Arising in Young Women Using Gene Expression ProfilingClinical Cancer Research, 2012
- Cost effectiveness of gene expression profiling for early stage breast cancerCancer, 2012
- Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100 000 women in 123 randomised trialsThe Lancet, 2012
- Prospective Multicenter Study of the Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay on Medical Oncologist and Patient Adjuvant Breast Cancer Treatment SelectionJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- Gene-Expression Signatures in Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trialsThe Lancet, 2005