Ethnic disparities in immunisation: analyses of zero-dose prevalence in 64 countries
Open Access
- 16 May 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Global Health
- Vol. 7 (5) , e008833
Abstract
Background: The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) recommend stratification of health indicators by ethnic group, yet there are few studies that have assessed if there are ethnic disparities in childhood immunisation in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: We identified 64 LMICs with standardised national surveys carried out since 2010, which provided information on ethnicity or a proxy variable and on vaccine coverage; 339 ethnic groups were identified after excluding those with fewer than 50 children in the sample and countries with a single ethnic group. Lack of vaccination with diphtheria–pertussis–tetanus vaccine—a proxy for no access to routine vaccination or ‘zero-dose’ status—was the outcome of interest. Differences among ethnic groups were assessed using a χ2 test for heterogeneity. Additional analyses controlled for household wealth, maternal education and urban–rural residence. Findings: The median gap between the highest and lowest zero-dose prevalence ethnic groups in all countries was equal to 10 percentage points (pp) (IQR 4–22), and the median ratio was 3.3 (IQR 1.8–6.7). In 35 of the 64 countries, there was significant heterogeneity in zero-dose prevalence among the ethnic groups. In most countries, adjustment for wealth, education and residence made little difference to the ethnic gaps, but in four countries (Angola, Benin, Nigeria and Philippines), the high–low ethnic gap decreased by over 15 pp after adjustment. Children belonging to a majority group had 29% lower prevalence of zero-dose compared with the rest of the sample. Interpretation: Statistically significant ethnic disparities in child immunisation were present in over half of the countries studied. Such inequalities have been seldom described in the published literature. Regular analyses of ethnic disparities are essential for monitoring trends, targeting resources and assessing the impact of health interventions to ensure zero-dose children are not left behind in the SDG era.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (N/A)
- GAVI Alliance (N/A)
- Wellcome Trust (101815/Z/13/Z)
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1199234)
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Inequalities in full immunization coverage: trends in low- and middle-income countriesBulletin of the World Health Organization, 2016
- Indigenous and tribal peoples' health (The Lancet–Lowitja Institute Global Collaboration): a population studyThe Lancet, 2016
- Monitoring subnational regional inequalities in health: measurement approaches and challengesInternational Journal for Equity in Health, 2016
- Measuring Coverage in MNCH: Tracking Progress in Health for Women and Children Using DHS and MICS Household SurveysPLOS Medicine, 2013
- Ethnic Disparities in Routine Immunization CoverageAsia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 2013
- Demographic and health surveys: a profileInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2012
- Identifying the determinants of childhood immunization in the PhilippinesVaccine, 2009
- Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratioBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2003
- The Structuring of Ethnic Inequalities in Health: Economic Position, Racial Discrimination, and RacismAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2003
- Ethnicity as an epidemiological determinant—crudely racist or crucially important?International Journal of Epidemiology, 2001