Initiating scientific collaborations across career levels and disciplines – a network analysis on behavioral data
Open Access
- 15 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
- Vol. 16 (2) , 151-184
Abstract
Collaborations are essential in research, especially in answering increasingly complex questions that require integrating knowledge from different disciplines and that engage multiple stakeholders. Fostering such collaboration between newcomers and established researchers helps keep scientific communities alive while opening the way to innovation. But this is a challenge for scientific communities, especially as little is known about the onset of such collaborations. Prior social network research suggests that face-to-face interaction at scientific events as well as both network-driven selection patterns (reciprocity and transitivity) and patterns of active selection of specific others (homophily / heterophily) may be important. Learning science research implies, moreover, that selecting appropriate collaboration partners may require group awareness. In a field study at two scientific events on technology-enhanced learning (Alpine Rendez-Vous 2011 and 2013) including N = 5736 relations between 287 researchers, we investigated how researchers selected future collaboration partners, looking specifically at the role of career level, disciplinary background, and selection patterns. Face-to-face contact was measured using RFID devices. Additionally, a group awareness intervention was experimentally varied. Data was analyzed using RSiena and meta-analyses. The results showed that transitivity, reciprocity and contact duration are relevant for the identification of new potential collaboration partners. PhD students were less often chosen as new potential collaboration partners, and researchers with a background in Information Technology selected fewer new potential collaboration partners. However, group awareness support balanced this disciplinary difference. Theoretical, methodological, and practical implications of these findings are discussed.Keywords
Funding Information
- European Union (STELLAR Network of Excellence)
- Université de Lyon (ANR-10-LABX-0081)
- Ruhr-Universität Bochum
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Coordinated Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: Awareness and Awareness ToolsEducational Psychologist, 2013
- What's in a crowd? Analysis of face-to-face behavioral networksJournal of Theoretical Biology, 2011
- Dynamics of Person-to-Person Interactions from Distributed RFID Sensor NetworksPLOS ONE, 2010
- When do researchers collaborate? Toward a model of collaboration propensityJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007
- Bias and Efficiency of Meta-Analytic Variance Estimators in the Random-Effects ModelJournal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2005
- Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social NetworksAnnual Review of Sociology, 2001
- Reflections on shared cognitionJournal of Organizational Behavior, 2001
- Why collaborate?Journal of the History of Biology, 1993
- Social Capital in the Creation of Human CapitalAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1988
- The Strength of Weak TiesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1973