Habitat of pre-hibernating larvae of the endangered butterfly Euphydryas aurinia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): What can be learned from vegetation composition and architecture?
Authors:
- Martin KonvickaMKMartin Konvicka
- Vladimir HulaVHVladimir Hula
- Zdenek FricZFZdenek Fric
Open Access
- 15 September 2003
- journal article
- Published by Biology Centre, AS CR in European Journal of Entomology
- Vol. 100 (3) , 313-322
Abstract
Habitats of pre-hibernating gregarious larvae of the endangered Marsh Fritillary butterfly (Euphydryas aurinia) were studied in field in Western Bohemia, Czech Republic. The species inhabits moist seminatural meadows managed by light grazing and haymaking; the only local host plant is Succisa pratensis. The redundancy analyses of the vegetation composition (around 166 nest-bearing and 381 unoccupied host plants) showed that nest presence was positively associated with short cushion-forming grasses (esp. Nardus stricta). It was negatively associated with competitively superior tall grasses (e.g., Deschampsia caespitosa) and tall herbs. Comparison of Ellenberg's indicator values of vegetation in occupied vs. unoccupied plots revealed that the nests were more often found in drier, nitrogen-poorer and more acidic conditions than unoccupied plants. Multiple regressions of nest presence against architecture of the host plants (170 occupied, 1280 unoccupied) revealed that the nests were associated with densely clumped host plants, low to medium height of sward and mechanical disturbance. The patterns agree with our knowledge of the biology of the larvae: short sward (related to low nitrogen, humidity, and low pH) facilitates larval basking; high host density reduces the likelihood of starvation. Sod disturbance facilitates host plant germination. The conditions favourable for the nests were also favourable for the host plant, but the plants grew in broader range of conditions than that occupied by the nests. The abandoning of a site results into a situation when the conditions first become intolerable for the butterfly, and ultimately for the plant. Since grazing and mowing have a different impact on vegetation composition and architecture, we propose that the studied populations have persisted in a semi-dynamic state in the two modes of management. Conservation management should mimic the dynamics of traditional land use on the smaller scales of extant colonies.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dynamic populations in a dynamic landscape: the metapopulation structure of the marsh fritillary butterflyEcography, 2002
- Nutrient enrichment in calcareous fens: effects on plant species and community structureBasic and Applied Ecology, 2002
- The influence of management regime and altitude on the population structure of Succisapratensis: implications for vegetation monitoringJournal of Applied Ecology, 2001
- Dispersal, distribution, patch network and metapopulation dynamics of the dingy skipper butterfly ( Erynnis tages )Oecologia, 1999
- Regeneration of a Gentiana pneumonanthe population in an oligotrophic wet meadowJournal of Vegetation Science, 1996
- The choice of oviposition sites in woodland by the Duke of Burgundy butterfly Hamearis lucina in EnglandBiological Conservation, 1994
- Sources of variations in patterns of plant–insect associationNature, 1993
- Ecological studies and the conservation of the bay checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas editha bayensisBiological Conservation, 1988
- The Ecology and Conservation of the Heath Fritillary Butterfly, Mellicta athalia. I. Host Selection and PhenologyJournal of Applied Ecology, 1987
- A quick method for estimating larval populations of Melitaea cinxia L. during surveysBiological Conservation, 1982