Differences in combinatorial calls among the 3 elephant species cannot be explained by phylogeny
- 23 February 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Behavioral Ecology
- Vol. 30 (3) , 809-820
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- National Science Foundation GRFP Fellowship
- Animal Behavior Society
- Sigma Xi (488010)
- American Society of Mammalogists
- Cornell University
- Athena Fund at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology
- National Geographic Society (3875–88, C16-02)
- Crystal Springs Foundation
- Austrian Science Fund (P26488-N30)
- United States Fish and Wildlife Service (96200-9-G231)
- Utopia Scientific
- University of Pennsylvania (NSF-IGERT 0504487)
- UC San Diego
- Linguistics Data Consortium
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Experimental Evidence for Phonemic Contrasts in a Nonhuman Vocal SystemPLOS Biology, 2015
- Language evolution: syntax before phonology?Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2014
- Titi monkey call sequences vary with predator location and typeBiology Letters, 2013
- Bonobos Extract Meaning from Call SequencesPLOS ONE, 2011
- Friends and Relations2011
- A forest monkey’s alarm call series to predator modelsBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2007
- Semantic combinations in primate callsNature, 2006
- Conceptual accessibility and sentence production in a free word order language (Odawa)Cognition, 2005
- What songbirds teach us about learningNature, 2002
- Observational Study of Behavior: Sampling MethodsBehaviour, 1974