Prognostic factors for recurrence and survival in anal cancer
Authors:
- Robert Glynne‐JonesRGRobert Glynne‐Jones
- David Sebag‐MontefioreDSDavid Sebag‐Montefiore
- Richard AdamsRARichard Adams
- Simon GollinsSGSimon Gollins
- for the United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research Anal Cancer Trial Working PartyFPfor the United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research Anal Cancer Trial Working Party
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Only 2 prospective studies have previously reported prognostic factors for anal cancer, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial 22861 (EORTC 22861) and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial 98‐11 (RTOG 98‐11). Both of those trials reported that clinically positive lymph nodes and male sex predicted poorer overall survival (OS). The EORTC 22861 trial indicated that the same factors were prognostic for locoregional control. In the current report, the authors investigated potential prognostic factors from the first United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research Anal Cancer Trial (ACT I), in which patients were randomized to receive either radiotherapy alone or chemoradiation (CRT) with concurrent 5‐fluorouracil/mitomycin C.METHODS: In the ACT I trial, associations between several baseline characteristics and 3 endpoints were investigated: locoregional failure (LRF), anal cancer death (ACD), and OS. The analyses were restricted to 292 patients who received CRT, which subsequently became standard treatment. A score was derived using multivariable Cox regression to identify the set of factors that, together, had the best prognostic performance. This score was then validated with a large, independent prospective trial (the ACT II trial).RESULTS: Palpable, clinically positive lymph nodes were associated with LRF (P = .012), a greater risk of ACD (P = .031), and decreased OS (P = .006) in multivariable analyses. Men had worse outcomes than women for LRF (P = .036), ACD (P = .039), and OS (P = .008). On average, a lower hemoglobin level had an adverse effect on ACD (P = .008), and a higher white blood cell count had an adverse effect on OS (P = .001). However, external validation of the score was poor for LRF (area under the curve [AUC] = 54%) but was better for ACD (AUC = 67%) and OS (AUC = 63%).CONCLUSIONS: The results from this analysis of the ACT I trial supported evidence for palpable lymph nodes and male sex as prognostic factors for LRF and OS, and lower hemoglobin levels and a higher white blood cell count were identified as prognostic factors for ACD and OS, respectively. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Induction Chemotherapy and Dose Intensification of the Radiation Boost in Locally Advanced Anal Canal Carcinoma: Final Analysis of the Randomized UNICANCER ACCORD 03 TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2012
- Importance of hemoglobin concentration and its modification for the outcome of head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapyActa Oncologica, 2012
- Pretreatment leukocytosis is an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with cervical cancerGynecologic Oncology, 2011
- Prognostic factors derived from a prospective database dictate clinical biology of anal cancerCancer, 2010
- The Prognostic Value of Hemoglobin in Patients With Anal Cancer Treated With ChemoradiotherapyDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2010
- Chemoradiation for the treatment of epidermoid anal cancer: 13-year follow-up of the first randomised UKCCCR Anal Cancer Trial (ACT I)British Journal of Cancer, 2010
- Outcomes and Prognostic Factors for Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Anal CanalDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2009
- Predictors and Patterns of Recurrence After Definitive Chemoradiation for Anal CancerInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics (IJROBP), 2007
- Tumor Site Predicts Outcome After Radiochemotherapy in Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Region: Long-Term Results of 101 PatientsDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2005
- Epidermoid anal cancer: Treatment by radiation alone or by radiation and 5-fluorouracil with and without mitomycin CInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics (IJROBP), 1991