Lawyers and the Structure of Influence in Washington
Authors:
- Robert L. NelsonRNRobert L. Nelson
- John P. HeinzJHJohn P. Heinz
- Edward O. LaumannELEdward O. Laumann
- Robert H. SalisburyRSRobert H. Salisbury
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Law & Society Review
- Vol. 22 (2) , 237-300
Abstract
Despite the widespread perception that lawyers exercise considerable influence over national policy making in the United States, their participation in the process has previously received little systematic empirical analysis. Based on a variety of evidence gathered in interviews with more than eight hundred Washington representatives, including data on their work, careers, contacts with government agencies, networks of acquaintance, and relationships with clients, we argue that lawyers are not as prevalent, active, or influential in national policy making as the popular image suggests. Rather, the findings indicate that lawyers occupy a relatively specialized niche in the system of interest representation, one that allows them to command substantial economic rewards and to maintain a measure of independence and autonomy in their work, but that limits their influence in policy formation.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Where the Legal Action is: Critical Legal Studies and Empiricism1986
- Ideology, Practice, and Professional Autonomy: Social Values and Client Relationships in the Large Law FirmStanford Law Review, 1985
- Washington Lawyers and Others: The Structure of Washington RepresentationStanford Law Review, 1985
- The Origins and Maintenance of Interest Groups in AmericaAmerican Political Science Review, 1983
- The New Deal Lawyers1982
- Building a New American State1982
- Affairs of State1977
- Causal Analysis of Data from Panel Studies and Other Kinds of SurveysAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1973
- A General Model for the Analysis of SurveysAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1972
- The Logic of Collective Action1965