Magnetic structure of the reconnection layer and core field generation in plasmoids
Authors:
- H. KarimabadiHKH. Karimabadi
- D. Krauss‐VarbanDKD. Krauss‐Varban
- N. OmidiNON. Omidi
- H. X. VuHVH. X. Vu
- 1 June 1999
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research
- Vol. 104 (A6) , 12313-12326
Abstract
Plasmoids/flux ropes have been observed both at Earth's magnetopause as well as in the magnetotail. Magnetic field measurements of such structures often reveal that rather than a minimum in field strength at their centers as expected from a simple O‐type neutral line picture, they exhibit a strong core field. To address this issue, two‐dimensional (2‐D) and 3‐D hybrid simulations are used to investigate the magnetic structure of reconnection layer in general and the formation of the core field within plasmoids in particular. The reconnection layer in the magnetotail is found to be unstable to the fire hose instability. As a result, the region between the lobe and the central plasma sheet is nearly at the marginal fire hose condition. The magnetic signatures of single and multiple X line geometries are contrasted, and it is shown that the interaction of outflowing jets from neighboring X lines leads in general to a highly complex magnetic structure within a plasmoid. The large observed core fields are explained in terms of Hall‐generated currents which can naturally lead to core field strengths that even exceed the ambient lobe field in magnitude. Ion beta and the presence of a preexisting guide field are two important factors controlling the Hall‐generated fields. In particular, it is shown that the presence of the small ubiquitous cross‐tail field component in the magnetotail can under certain conditions lead to a strong unipolar plasmoid core field. There exist significant differences between core fields associated with plasmoids at the magnetopause and those in the tail. This is due to (1) high plasma beta in the magnetosheath and (2) the asymmetry in plasma density across the magnetopause. The former leads to smaller core fields at the magnetopause, whereas the latter leads to differences in the polarity and structure of core fields within magnetopause and magnetotail plasmoids. Such differences are illustrated through examples.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Statistical analysis of the plasmoid evolution with Geotail observationsJournal of Geophysical Research, 1998
- Ion kinetic effects in magnetic reconnection: Hybrid simulationsJournal of Geophysical Research, 1998
- A simple model of core field generation during plasmoid evolutionJournal of Geophysical Research, 1996
- Large‐scale hybrid simulations of the magnetotail during reconnectionGeophysical Research Letters, 1995
- GEOTAIL low energy particle and magnetic field observations of a plasmoid at XGSM = −142 REGeophysical Research Letters, 1994
- Core magnetic field enhancement in single X line, multiple X line and patchy reconnectionJournal of Geophysical Research, 1994
- On the formation and evolution of plasmoids: A survey of ISEE 3 geotail dataJournal of Geophysical Research, 1992
- A comparison of analytical and numerical models for steadily driven magnetic reconnectionReviews of Geophysics, 1987
- Structure of the magnetotail at 220 RE and its response to geomagnetic activityGeophysical Research Letters, 1984
- Magnetic field rotation through the magnetopause: ISEE 1 and 2 observationsJournal of Geophysical Research, 1982