Predictors for participation in DNA self-sampling of childhood cancer survivors in Switzerland
Open Access
- 29 October 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Vol. 21 (1) , 1-9
Abstract
Research on germline genetic variants relies on enough eligible participants which is difficult to achieve for rare diseases such as childhood cancer. With self-collection kits, participants can contribute genetic samples conveniently from their home. Demographic and clinical factors were identified previously that influenced participation in mailed self-collection. People with pre-existing heritable diagnoses might participate differently in germline DNA collection which might render sampling biased in this group. In this nationwide cross-sectional study, we analysed predictive factors of participation in DNA self-collection including heritable diagnoses. We identified childhood cancer survivors from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry for invitation to germline DNA self-sampling in September 2019. Participants received saliva sampling kits by postal mail at their home, were asked to fill them, sign an informed consent, and send them back by mail. Two reminders were sent to non-participants by mail. We compared demographic, clinical, and treatment information of participants with non-participants using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. We invited 928 childhood cancer survivors in Switzerland with a median age of 26.5 years (interquartile range 19-37), of which 463 (50%) participated. After the initial send out of the sampling kit, 291 (63%) had participated, while reminder letters led to 172 additional participants (37%). Foreign nationality (odds ratio [OR] 0.5; 95%-confidence interval [CI] 0.4-0.7), survivors aged 30-39 years at study versus other age groups (OR 0.5; CI 0.4-0.8), and survivors with a known cancer predisposition syndrome (OR 0.5; CI 0.3-1.0) were less likely to participate in germline DNA collection. Survivors with a second primary neoplasm (OR 1.9; CI 1.0-3.8) or those living in a French or Italian speaking region (OR 1.3; CI 1.0-1.8) tended to participate more. We showed that half of childhood cancer survivors participated in germline DNA self-sampling relying completely on mailing of sample kits. Written reminders increased the response by about one third. More targeted recruitment strategies may be advocated for people of foreign nationality, aged 30-39 years, and those with cancer predisposition syndromes. Perceptions of genetic research and potential barriers to participation of survivors need to be better understood. Biobank: https://directory.bbmri-eric.eu/#/collection/bbmri-eric:ID:CH_HopitauxUniversitairesGeneve:collection:CH_BaHOP Research project: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04702321.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cause‐specific long‐term mortality in survivors of childhood cancer in Switzerland: A population‐based studyInternational Journal of Cancer, 2016
- Collaborative Research in Childhood Cancer Survivorship: The Current LandscapeJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2015
- Research participants in NGS studies want to know about incidental findingsEuropean Journal of Human Genetics, 2015
- Clinical Ascertainment of Health Outcomes Among Adults Treated for Childhood CancerJAMA, 2013
- Saliva samples are a viable alternative to blood samples as a source of DNA for high throughput genotypingBMC Medical Genomics, 2012
- Characteristics of responders to a request for a buccal cell specimen among survivors of childhood cancer and their siblingsPediatric Blood & Cancer, 2010
- Clinical trial participant characteristics and saliva and DNA metricsBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2009
- New saliva DNA collection method compared to buccal cell collection techniques for epidemiological studiesAmerican Journal of Human Biology, 2007
- International Classification of Childhood Cancer, third editionCancer, 2005
- Racial and ethnic differences in patient perceptions of bias and cultural competence in health careJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2004