Do firms pay for audit risk? Evidence on risk premiums in audit fees after direct control for audit effort
Author:
- 10 March 2002
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Auditing
- Vol. 6 (1) , 37-51
Abstract
This paper documents the existence of risk premiums in actual audit fees after direct control of audit effort through audit hours in a legal environment (Finland) that can be characterised as mildly litigious. Audit fee and hour data were obtained from the internal archives of four Big Six audit firms. The results suggest that when the client is a listed company, or when the auditor's perceived business risk of the client is higher than average, the audit fee contains a risk premium. As the existence of risk premiums can be documented in the institutional setting examined in this paper, they are also likely to be found in more litigious settings.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Auditors' Perceived Business Risk and Audit Fees: Analysis and EvidenceJournal of Accounting Research, 2001
- UK Auditor Liability: An Insurable Risk?International Journal of Auditing, 1998
- Resource Allocation Decisions in Audit Engagements*Contemporary Accounting Research, 1997
- The market for audit services in the NetherlandsEuropean Accounting Review, 1997
- The Provision of Non‐audit Services and the Pricing of Audit FeesJournal of Business Finance & Accounting, 1997
- Auditor Reputation: The International Empirical EvidenceInternational Journal of Auditing, 1997
- AUDITOR SWITCHING: THE PRICING OF AUDIT SERVICESJournal of Business Finance & Accounting, 1995
- Lawsuits against AuditorsJournal of Accounting Research, 1994
- THE DETERMINATION OF AUDIT FEES: AN ANALYSIS IN THE SINGAPORE CONTEXTJournal of Business Finance & Accounting, 1990
- Audit Prices, Product Differentiation, and Scale Economies: Further Evidence from the Australian MarketJournal of Accounting Research, 1986