A double‐blind crossover comparison of pindolol, metoprolol, atenolol and labetalol in mild to moderate hypertension.
Authors:
- JJ McNeilJMJJ McNeil
- Wj LouisWLWj Louis
- 1 April 1979
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Vol. 8 (S2) , 163S-6S
Abstract
1 This study was designed to compare in a double‐blind randomized crossover trial, atenolol, labetalol, metoprolol and pindolol. Considerable differences in dose (atenolol 138 +/‐ 13 mg daily; labetalol 308 +/‐ 34 mg daily; metoprolol 234 +/‐ 22 mg daily; and pindolol 24 +/‐2 mg daily were required to produce similar antihypertensive effects. 3 The overall incidence of side‐effects was similar with atenolol, metoprolol and pindolol but was slightly less with labetalol. Sleep disturbances and abnormal dreaming patterns were most frequent with pindolol. 4 There was a significantly greater fall in pulse rate during atenolol and metoprolol treatment periods.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- COMPARISON OF METOPROLOL AND PINDOLOL IN THE TREATMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE HYPERTENSION: A DOUBLE‐BLIND CROSSOVER STUDYMedical Journal of Australia, 1979
- A Comparison of Metoprolol and Propranolol on Blood Pressure and Respiratory Function in Patients with HypertensionAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Comparison of antihypertensive activity of beta-blocking drugs during chronic treatment.BMJ, 1976
- Experience with pindolol, a betareceptor blocker, in the treatment of hypertensionThe American Journal of Medicine, 1976
- A comparison of beta adrenergic blocking drugs in the treatment of hypertensionPostgraduate Medical Journal, 1974
- THE USE OF PRINDOLOL (VISKEN) IN THE TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSIONMedical Journal of Australia, 1972
- Use of Propranolol (Inderal) in Treatment of HypertensionBMJ, 1964