Reducing number entry errors: solving a widespread, serious problem
Open Access
- 7 April 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Royal Society in Journal of The Royal Society Interface
- Vol. 7 (51) , 1429-1439
Abstract
Number entry is ubiquitous: it is required in many fields including science, healthcare, education, government, mathematics and finance. People entering numbers are to be expected to make errors, but shockingly few systems make any effort to detect, block or otherwise manage errors. Worse, errors may be ignored but processed in arbitrary ways, with unintended results. A standard class of error (defined in the paper) is an ‘out by 10 error’, which is easily made by miskeying a decimal point or a zero. In safety-critical domains, such as drug delivery, out by 10 errors generally have adverse consequences. Here, we expose the extent of the problem of numeric errors in a very wide range of systems. An analysis of better error management is presented: under reasonable assumptions, we show that the probability of out by 10 errors can be halved by better user interface design. We provide a demonstration user interface to show that the approach is practical. To kill an error is as good a service as, and sometimes even better than, the establishing of a new truth or fact. (Charles Darwin 1879 [2008] , p. 229)Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- ViewpointRetrospectiveCommunications of the ACM, 2009
- A direct path to dependable softwareCommunications of the ACM, 2009
- FEATUREIgnorance of interaction programming is killing peopleInteractions, 2008
- Why did that happen? Exploring the proliferation of barely usable software in healthcare systemsQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2006
- Programming errors contribute to death from patient-controlled analgesia: case report and estimate of probabilityCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2003
- Tenfold Medication Dose Prescribing ErrorsAnnals of Pharmacotherapy, 2002
- Calculators are needlessly badInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2000