Correlation of MR Imaging Findings and Clinical Manifestations in Neurosarcoidosis
Authors:
- R. ShahR. Shah
- G.H. RobersonGRG.H. Roberson
- J.K. CuréJCJ.K. Curé
Open Access
- 4 February 2009
- journal article
- Published by American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR) in American Journal of Neuroradiology
- Vol. 30 (5) , 953-961
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR imaging is widely used for the diagnosis and follow-up of neurosarcoidosis lesions. However, the temporal evolution of imaging abnormalities and the prognostic significance of imaging features is not well understood. We undertook a retrospective study of patients with biopsy-proved or clinically diagnosed neurosarcoidosis for the following reasons: 1) to assess concordance between abnormalities noted on MR imaging with neurologic symptoms at presentation; 2) to correlate changes in imaging findings during follow-up with clinical improvement or worsening; and 3) to identify imaging features that may have prognostic significance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed radiologic records from 1999 to 2008 of patients with biopsy-proved or clinically diagnosed neurosarcoidosis and correlated MR imaging findings in these patients with their demographic characteristics, clinical features, and symptomatic responses during follow-up. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were included in the study. Cranial nerve lesions and leptomeningeal disease identified on MR imaging were symptomatic in 64% patients, dural lesions were associated with symptoms in 28% patients, but nonenhancing white matter lesions did not have correlating symptoms. During follow-up, MR imaging findings generally changed in concordance with the change in clinical symptoms (80% patients). Cranial nerve enhancement (9/11) and spinal lesions (5/8) were most likely to resolve with clinical improvement, whereas dural lesions (6/11), enhancing parenchymal lesions (3/7), and non-enhancing parenchymal lesions (0/4) were less likely to change during therapy. Patients with ≥1 enhancing T2-hypointense lesion (4/7, 57%) were less likely to show clinical improvement than those without such lesions (12/13, 92%). CONCLUSIONS: Although many sarcoid-related MR imaging abnormalities were not associated with correlating symptoms at presentation, there was a high degree of concordance between changes in clinical symptoms and MR imaging abnormalities during follow-up. Enhancing T2-hypointense dural and parenchymal lesions were associated with suboptimal imaging and clinical response to immunosuppressive therapy.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- NeurosarcoidosisClinical Imaging, 2004
- Imaging Manifestations of NeurosarcoidosisAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2004
- Role of radiology in the diagnosis of neurosarcoidosisEuropean Radiology, 2000
- Statement on SarcoidosisAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1999
- Central nervous system sarcoidosisdiagnosis and managementQJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Racial Differences in Sarcoidosis Incidence: A 5-Year Study in a Health Maintenance OrganizationAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1997
- NeurosarcoidosisAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1986
- THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF SARCOIDOSIS IN ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA: A POPULATION-BASED STUDY OF INCIDENCE AND SURVIVAL1American Journal of Epidemiology, 1986
- Sarcoidosis and Its Neurological ManifestationsArchives of Neurology, 1985
- Course and prognosis of sarcoidosis around the worldThe American Journal of Medicine, 1974