How we can measure the non-driving-task engagement in automated driving: Comparing flow experience and workload
- 1 February 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Applied Ergonomics
- Vol. 67, 237-245
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does skills–demands compatibility result in intrinsic motivation? Experimental test of a basic notion proposed in the theory of flow-experiencesThe Journal of Positive Psychology, 2011
- Mental workload when driving in a simulator: Effects of age and driving complexityAccident Analysis & Prevention, 2009
- Differences of drivers’ reaction times according to age and mental workloadAccident Analysis & Prevention, 2008
- What's skill got to do with it? Vehicle automation and driver mental workloadErgonomics, 2007
- Effects of practice, age, and task demands, on interference from a phone task while drivingAccident Analysis & Prevention, 2005
- Flow and Media EnjoymentCommunication Theory, 2004
- Taking the load off: investigations of how adaptive cruise control affects mental workloadErgonomics, 2004
- Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control taskErgonomics, 1999
- THE CONDITIONS OF FLOW IN READING: TWO STUDIES OF OPTIMAL EXPERIENCEReading Psychology, 1996
- Optimal experience in work and leisure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989