Real-world association between systemic corticosteroid exposure and complications in US patients with severe asthma
Authors:
Open Access
- 26 March 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
- Vol. 20 (1) , 1-13
Abstract
Background: Systemic corticosteroid (SCS) use remains widespread among patients with severe asthma, despite associated complications. Objective: Evaluate the association between cumulative SCS exposure and SCS-related complications in severe asthma. Methods: This retrospective, longitudinal study used claims data from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart database (GSK ID: 214469). Eligible patients (≥ 12 years old) had an asthma diagnosis and were divided into two cohorts: SCS use and non/burst-SCS use. Patients in the SCS use cohort had a claim for a daily prednisone-equivalent dose ≥ 5 mg SCS following ≥ 6 months of continuous SCS use; those in the non/burst-SCS cohort had no evidence of continuous SCS use and had a non-SCS controller/rescue medication initiation claim. For each cohort, the date of the qualifying claim was the index date. SCS users were further stratified by SCS use during each quarter of follow-up: low (≤ 6 mg/day), medium (> 6–12 mg/day), high (> 12 mg/day), and continuous high (≥ 20 mg/day for 90 days). SCS-related complications were evaluated in the quarter following SCS exposure. The adjusted odds ratios (OR) of experiencing SCS-related complications during follow-up in each of the SCS use groups versus the non/burst SCS cohort were calculated using generalized estimating equations models. Results: SCS and non/burst-SCS use cohorts included 7473 and 89,281 patients (mean follow-up: 24.6 and 24.2 months), respectively. Compared with the non/burst-SCS use cohort, medium, high, and continuous high SCS use was associated with greater odds of any SCS-related complication (adjusted OR [95% confidence interval]: 1.30 [1.21, 1.39], 1.49 [1.35, 1.64] and 1.63 [1.40, 1.89], respectively) including increased acute gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and immune system-related complications, and chronic cardiovascular, metabolic/endocrine, central nervous system, bone-/muscle-related, ophthalmologic, and hematologic/oncologic complications. Low-dose SCS use was also associated with significantly increased odds of acute gastrointestinal and immune system-related complications, and chronic bone-/muscle-related and hematologic/oncologic complications versus the non/burst-SCS use cohort. Conclusion: SCS use, even at low doses, is associated with increased risk of SCS-related complications among patients with severe asthma.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- GSK (214469)
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Overuse of Oral Corticosteroids in Asthma Is Often Underdiagnosed and Inadequately AddressedThe Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 2022
- Cost-effectiveness and comparative effectiveness of biologic therapy for asthmaAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2019
- Cost-Effectiveness of Biological Asthma Treatments: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Future Economic EvaluationsPharmacoEconomics, 2018
- Long-term Systemic Corticosteroid Exposure: A Systematic Literature ReviewClinical Therapeutics, 2017
- Oral Glucocorticoid–Sparing Effect of Benralizumab in Severe AsthmaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2017
- Acute and chronic systemic corticosteroid–related complications in patients with severe asthmaJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2015
- Oral Glucocorticoid-Sparing Effect of Mepolizumab in Eosinophilic AsthmaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2014
- Effect of asthma exacerbations on health care costs among asthmatic patients with moderate and severe persistent asthmaJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2012
- Incidence and US Costs of Corticosteroid-Associated Adverse Events: A Systematic Literature ReviewClinical Therapeutics, 2011
- Goodness‐of‐fit diagnostics for the propensity score model when estimating treatment effects using covariate adjustment with the propensity scorePharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2008