Incidence of Post-Procedural Conduction Disturbances and Rates of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Older and Newer Generations of Transcatheter Aortic Heart Valves
Open Access
- 30 November 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Medical Sciences
- Vol. 13 (4) , 296
Abstract
Objective: This analysis compares new (G2) versus old (G1) generations of transcatheter heart valves (THVs) in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures, focusing on key outcomes: post-procedural conduction disturbance (CD) and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI). We aim to determine whether G2 valves reduce these specific complications and thereby improve patient outcomes compared with G1. Methods: From February 2015 to September 2022, 1468 patients underwent TAVR at the university clinic in Kiel. After applying exclusion criteria, a final cohort of 1182 patients were analysed. Among these, 782 patients underwent TAVR with G1, whereas 400 underwent TAVR with G2. The primary study endpoints were the occurrence of new CD and PPMI within 30 days post-procedure. The secondary endpoints included diverse post-TAVR events as defined by the safety criteria of Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC III). A statistical analysis compared outcomes between the G1 and G2 groups. Results: Out of 1182 patients, 12.1% required PPMI within 30 days. Rates showed no statistical difference between G2 and G1 for PPMI (10.3% vs. 13.0%, IPTW-weighted p = 0.31) or CD (15.3% vs. 21.48%, IPTW-weighted p = 0.08). Among G2, the Sapien 3 Ultra valve had the lowest PPMI rate (4.8%). Overall, G2 and G1 had similar post-procedural and 30-day mortality rates. Conclusion: G2 valves may reduce post-procedure CD, but the difference is not statistically significant. Differences between specific valve types—such as the Sapien 3 Ultra’s lower rates—are notable, but overall, PPMI and safety profiles remain similar between G1 and G2. Patient and procedural factors still play a significant role. Careful valve and patient selection is essential, and ongoing research will guide further improvements.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With the Navitor System: Real-World United Kingdom ExperienceThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2024
- Comparison of permanent pacemaker implantation rate after first and second generation of transcatheter aortic valve implantation–A retrospective cohort studyCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2021
- Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With New Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2018
- Evaluation of current practices in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: The WRITTEN (WoRldwIde TAVI ExperieNce) surveyInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2017
- Treatment of Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis With a Novel Resheathable Supra-Annular Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve SystemJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2015
- Predictors and Clinical Outcomes of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2015
- Comparison of Balloon-Expandable vs Self-expandable Valves in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementJAMA, 2014
- Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Aortic Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementJACC, 2013
- Need for Permanent Pacemaker as a Complication of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Elderly Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Similar Baseline Electrocardiographic FindingsJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2012
- The Effects of Right Ventricular Apical Pacing on Ventricular Function and DyssynchronyJACC, 2009