Spatially-explicit mapping of forest benefits and analysis of motivations for everyday-life’s visitors on forest pathways in urban and rural contexts
Authors:
- Markus A. MeyerMarkus A. Meyer
- Joachim RathmannJRJoachim Rathmann
- Christoph SchulzCSChristoph Schulz
- 1 May 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Landscape and Urban Planning
- Vol. 185, 83-95
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- University of Münster
- LMU
- University of Augsburg
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- Applying Best–Worst Scaling in a stated preference analysis of forest management programsJournal of Forest Economics, 2012
- Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agendaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012
- Urban land teleconnections and sustainabilityProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012
- A Review of the Elements of Human Well-Being with an Emphasis on the Contribution of Ecosystem ServicesAMBIO, 2012
- GIS-assisted mapping of landscape suitability for nearby recreationLandscape and Urban Planning, 2012
- Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem servicesEcology Letters, 2009
- Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision makingEcological Economics, 2009
- Recreation conflict potential and management implications in the northern/central Black Forest Nature ParkJournal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2008
- Ecosystem services in urban areasEcological Economics, 1999
- The aesthetics of forestry: What has empirical preference research taught us?Environmental Management, 1989