A core outcome set for localised prostate cancer effectiveness trials: protocol for a systematic review of the literature and stakeholder involvement through interviews and a Delphi survey
Open Access
- 4 March 2015
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Trials
- Vol. 16 (1) , 1-10
Abstract
Prostate cancer is a growing health problem worldwide. The management of localised prostate cancer is controversial. It is unclear which of several surgical, radiotherapeutic, ablative, and surveillance treatments is the most effective. All have cost, process and recovery, and morbidity implications which add to treatment decision-making complexity for patients and healthcare professionals. Evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not optimal because of uncertainty as to what constitutes important outcomes. Another issue hampering evidence synthesis is heterogeneity of outcome definition, measurement, and reporting. This project aims to determine which outcomes are the most important to patients and healthcare professionals, and use these findings to recommend a standardised core outcome set for comparative effectiveness trials of treatments for localised prostate cancer, to optimise decision-making. The range of potentially important outcomes and measures will be identified through systematic reviews of the literature and semi-structured interviews with patients. A consultation exercise involving representatives from two key stakeholder groups (patients and healthcare professionals) will ratify the list of outcomes to be entered into a three round Delphi study. The Delphi process will refine and prioritise the list of identified outcomes. A methodological substudy (nested RCT design) will also be undertaken. Participants will be randomised after round one of the Delphi study to one of three feedback groups, based on different feedback strategies, in order to explore the potential impact of feedback strategies on participant responses. This may assist the design of a future core outcome set and Delphi studies. Following the Delphi study, a final consensus meeting attended by representatives from both stakeholder groups will determine the final recommended core outcome set. This study will inform clinical practice and future trials of interventions of localised prostate cancer by standardising a core outcome set which should be considered in comparative effectiveness studies for localised prostate cancer.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to considerTrials, 2012
- Radical Prostatectomy versus Observation for Localized Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in childhood asthma: a survey of clinicians, parents, and young peopleTrials, 2012
- International Variation in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality RatesEuropean Urology, 2012
- Urological cancer care pathways: development and use in the context of systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelinesWorld Journal of Urology, 2011
- Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomyBritish Journal of Cancer, 2009
- Positive Surgical Margins in Radical Prostatectomy: Outlining the Problem and Its Long-Term ConsequencesEuropean Urology, 2009
- A modified Delphi exercise to determine the extent of consensus with OMERACT outcome domains for studies of acute and chronic goutAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2008
- Open Versus Laparoscopic Radical ProstatectomyThe Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2007
- Rising incidence of prostate cancer in Scotland: increased risk or increased detection?BJU International, 2000