CSChen Suo

Chen Suo

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Chen Suo has a total of 33 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Ullam quas excepturi minus iusto.

    by Tyrese Swaniawski, Deonte Powlowski, Myrl Koelpin, Zoe Bergstrom, Sterling Price, Jazlyn Bradtke, Daphne Sawayn, Leopoldo White, Sallie Prohaska

    Beatae explicabo excepturi ad omnis vel est. Quae est quae tempore omnis sed voluptas dolorem. Consequatur similique iusto ut ipsam repellat praesentium rerum. Iste doloremque explicabo vero. Rerum rerum delectus assumenda velit excepturi corporis qui qui. Sapiente debitis sit ut rem ea eos. Nemo quia eligendi minus sunt fugiat deserunt officiis. Nam quaerat quia aut a et et ut.

  • Open Access

    Integrated molecular portrait of non-small cell lung cancers

    by Vladimir Lazar, Chen Suo, Cedric Orear, Joost van Den Oord, Zsofia Balogh, Justine Guegan, Bastien Job, Guillaume Meurice, Hugues Ripoche, Stefano Calza, et al.

    Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a leading cause of cancer deaths, represents a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, mostly comprising squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), adenocarcinoma (AC) and large-cell carcinoma (LCC). The objectives of this study were to utilize integrated genomic data including copy-number alteration, mRNA, microRNA expression and candidate-gene full sequencing data to characterize the molecular distinctions between AC and SCC.Methods: Comparative genomic hybridization followed by mutational analysis, gene expression and miRNA microarray profiling were performed on 123 paired tumor and non-tumor tissue samples from patients with NSCLC.Results: At DNA, mRNA and miRNA levels we could identify molecular markers that discriminated significantly between the various histopathological entities of NSCLC. We identified 34 genomic clusters using aCGH data; several genes exhibited a different profile of aberrations between AC and SCC, including PIK3CA, SOX2, THPO, TP63, PDGFB genes. Gene expression profiling analysis identified SPP1, CTHRC1and GREM1 as potential biomarkers for early diagnosis of the cancer, and SPINK1 and BMP7 to distinguish between AC and SCC in small biopsies or in blood samples. Using integrated genomics approach we found in recurrently altered regions a list of three potential driver genes, MRPS22, NDRG1 and RNF7, which were consistently over-expressed in amplified regions, had wide-spread correlation with an average of ~800 genes throughout the genome and highly associated with histological types. Using a network enrichment analysis, the targets of these potential drivers were seen to be involved in DNA replication, cell cycle, mismatch repair, p53 signalling pathway and other lung cancer related signalling pathways, and many immunological pathways. Furthermore, we also identified one potential driver miRNA hsa-miR-944.Conclusions: Integrated molecular characterization of AC and SCC helped identify clinically relevant markers and potential drivers, which are recurrent and stable changes at DNA level that have functional implications at RNA level and have strong association with histological subtypes.


  • Open Access

    Analysis of multiple phenotypes in genome-wide genetic mapping studies

    by Chen Suo, Timothea Toulopoulou, Elvira Bramon, Muriel Walshe, Marco Picchioni, Robin Murray, Jurg Ott

    Complex traits may be defined by a range of different criteria. It would result in a loss of information to perform analyses simply on the basis of a final clinical dichotomized affected / unaffected variable. We assess the performance of four alternative approaches for the analysis of multiple phenotypes in genetic association studies. We describe the four methods in detail and discuss their relative theoretical merits and disadvantages. Using simulation we demonstrate that PCA provides the greatest power when applied to both correlated phenotypes and with large numbers of phenotypes. The multivariate approach had low type I error only with independent phenotypes or small numbers of phenotypes. In this study, our application of the four methods to schizophrenia data provides converging evidence of the relative performance of the methods. Via power analysis of simulated data and testing of experimental data, we conclude that PCA, creating one variable based on a linear combination of all the traits, performs optimally. We propose that our comparison will provide insight into the properties of the methods and help researchers to choose appropriate strategy in future experimental studies.