Michael S. Gordon
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Michael S. Gordon has a total of 109 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Timothy W. Kinlock
University of Baltimore, School of Criminal Justice, 10 W. Preston Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States
10 shared publicationsFrank J. Vocci
Friends Research Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
8 shared publicationsRobert P. Schwartz
Friends Research Institute, 1040 Park Avenue, Suite 103, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
7 shared publicationsTerrence T. Fitzgerald
Glenwood Life Counseling Center, 516 Glenwood Ave, Baltimore, MD 21212, USA
5 shared publications- Edward V. Nunes
Department of Psychiatry Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York NY USA
4 shared publications - Joshua David Lee
New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
4 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 1 September 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
- Vol. 128, 108241
A clinical protocol of a comparative effectiveness trial of extended-release naltrexone versus extended-release buprenorphine with individuals leaving jail
- 1 September 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
- Vol. 128, 108241
A clinical protocol of a comparative effectiveness trial of extended-release naltrexone versus extended-release buprenorphine with individuals leaving jail
- Open Access
- 2 December 2019
- Published by Springer Nature in Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
- Vol. 14 (1) , 1-11
Longitudinal analysis of HIV-risk behaviors of participants in a randomized trial of prison-initiated buprenorphine
Background: It has been estimated that approximately 15% of people who are incarcerated in the US have histories of opioid use disorder. Relapse to opioid use after release from prison poses a serious risk of HIV infection. Prison-initiated buprenorphine may help to reduce HIV infection given the association between opioid use and HIV-risk behaviors. Methods: The present study is a secondary analysis of longitudinal data gathered from a randomized controlled trial of buprenorphine-naloxone for people who were incarcerated (N = 211) between 2008 and 2012. It compares the impact of assignment to initiate buprenorphine in prison (N = 106 randomized, N = 104 analyzed) versus in the community (N = 107 randomized, N = 107 analyzed) and whether or not participants entered community treatment on the frequency of HIV-risk behaviors in the 12 months following release from prison. Data were analyzed hierarchically and for each outcome variable, a multilevel, over-dispersed Poisson model was fit to the data. Outcome variables were the number of times the following behaviors occurred in the last 30 days: (1) having sex without a condom (2) injecting drugs (3) using unsterilized needles, and (4) sharing injection paraphernalia. Results: Participants assigned to begin buprenorphine in the community experienced a greater decrease in injection drug use over time compared to participants assigned to begin buprenorphine in prison. There were no significant associations between treatment assignment or community treatment entry and instances of having sex without a condom, sharing injection paraphernalia, or using unsterilized needles. Conclusions: Overall, the present study did not find support for the initiation of buprenorphine in prison (as opposed to the community) as a means to reduce incidences of HIV-risk behaviors. Avenues for future research in the nexus of HIV-risk reduction, criminal justice, and pharmacotherapy are discussed. Trial registration This study was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Buprenorphine for Prisoners (PI: Kinlock; R01DA021579). ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT 00574067
- 2 December 2019
- Published by Springer Nature in Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
- Vol. 14 (1) , 1-11
Open AccessLongitudinal analysis of HIV-risk behaviors of participants in a randomized trial of prison-initiated buprenorphine
Background: It has been estimated that approximately 15% of people who are incarcerated in the US have histories of opioid use disorder. Relapse to opioid use after release from prison poses a serious risk of HIV infection. Prison-initiated buprenorphine may help to reduce HIV infection given the association between opioid use and HIV-risk behaviors. Methods: The present study is a secondary analysis of longitudinal data gathered from a randomized controlled trial of buprenorphine-naloxone for people who were incarcerated (N = 211) between 2008 and 2012. It compares the impact of assignment to initiate buprenorphine in prison (N = 106 randomized, N = 104 analyzed) versus in the community (N = 107 randomized, N = 107 analyzed) and whether or not participants entered community treatment on the frequency of HIV-risk behaviors in the 12 months following release from prison. Data were analyzed hierarchically and for each outcome variable, a multilevel, over-dispersed Poisson model was fit to the data. Outcome variables were the number of times the following behaviors occurred in the last 30 days: (1) having sex without a condom (2) injecting drugs (3) using unsterilized needles, and (4) sharing injection paraphernalia. Results: Participants assigned to begin buprenorphine in the community experienced a greater decrease in injection drug use over time compared to participants assigned to begin buprenorphine in prison. There were no significant associations between treatment assignment or community treatment entry and instances of having sex without a condom, sharing injection paraphernalia, or using unsterilized needles. Conclusions: Overall, the present study did not find support for the initiation of buprenorphine in prison (as opposed to the community) as a means to reduce incidences of HIV-risk behaviors. Avenues for future research in the nexus of HIV-risk reduction, criminal justice, and pharmacotherapy are discussed. Trial registration This study was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Buprenorphine for Prisoners (PI: Kinlock; R01DA021579). ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT 00574067
- 1 April 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Contemporary Clinical Trials
- Vol. 79, 21-27
A randomized controlled trial of buprenorphine for probationers and parolees: Bridging the gap into treatment
- 1 April 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Contemporary Clinical Trials
- Vol. 79, 21-27
A randomized controlled trial of buprenorphine for probationers and parolees: Bridging the gap into treatment
- 1 January 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Drug and Alcohol Dependence
- Vol. 194, 59-68
Approaches for creating comparable measures of alcohol use symptoms: Harmonization with eight studies of criminal justice populations
- 1 January 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Drug and Alcohol Dependence
- Vol. 194, 59-68
Approaches for creating comparable measures of alcohol use symptoms: Harmonization with eight studies of criminal justice populations
- 1 July 2018
- Published by Elsevier in Drug and Alcohol Dependence
- Vol. 188, 232-238
Initiating buprenorphine treatment prior to versus after release from prison: Arrest outcomes
- 1 July 2018
- Published by Elsevier in Drug and Alcohol Dependence
- Vol. 188, 232-238
Initiating buprenorphine treatment prior to versus after release from prison: Arrest outcomes
- 1 February 2018
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
- Vol. 85, 66-69
Healthcare utilization in adults with opioid dependence receiving extended release naltrexone compared to treatment as usual
- 1 February 2018
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
- Vol. 85, 66-69
Healthcare utilization in adults with opioid dependence receiving extended release naltrexone compared to treatment as usual
- 22 December 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in AIDS and Behavior
- Vol. 22 (3) , 1030-1038
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Intensive Case Management (Project Bridge) for HIV-Infected Probationers and Parolees
Individuals on probation and parole are disproportionately at high risk for HIV infection and experience significant barriers to accessing health care. This study was a two-group randomized controlled trial conducted at a community corrections office and was designed to link HIV positive probationers/parolees to HIV treatment in the community. HIV positive participants were assigned to one of the two treatment conditions: (1) Project Bridge (PB), an intensive case-management intervention; or (2) treatment as usual (TAU), involving standard referral to treatment. We hypothesized that PB would be more effective than TAU in terms of initiating individuals in community HIV treatment. We found no difference in rates of, or time to, treatment initiation when comparing the PB to TAU (all ns > 0.05). Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference between HIV medication regiment initiation by treatment condition (all p > 0.05). Despite limitations, we found that probationers and parolees were willing to be screened and linked to treatment. Las personas en período de prueba y libertad condicional tienen un riesgo desproporcionado de infección con el virus de inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH) y experimentan barreras significantes para acceder a la atención médica. Esta investigación fue un ensayo aleatorio controlado con dos grupos y llevado a cabo en una oficina de corrección de la comunidad y fue diseñado para conectar a personas VIH positivas en período de prueba y/o libertad condicional con tratamientos disponibles para VIH en la comunidad. Participantes con un diagnóstico VIH positivo fueron asignados, por género, a una de las dos condiciones de tratamiento: 1) Project Bridge (PB), una intervención intensiva de manejo de casos; o 2) tratamiento usual (TAU por sus siglas en inglés), el cual fue una referencia estándar para el tratamiento. Nosotros planteamos como hipótesis que PB sería más efectivo que TAU en términos de iniciación de individuos a tratamiento de VIH comunitario. Al comparar el PB con el TAU, no encontramos diferencias en las tasas de iniciación de tratamiento, ni en el tiempo para iniciación del tratamiento. Adicionalmente, no hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativa entre el PB o el TAU al comparar el inicio de regímenes médicos para el tratamiento de VIH (todo ns > 0.05). A pesar de las limitaciones, encontramos que las personas en período de prueba y libertad condicional estaban dispuestas a someterse a exámenes de VIH y conectarse a tratamientos disponibles.
- 22 December 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in AIDS and Behavior
- Vol. 22 (3) , 1030-1038
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Intensive Case Management (Project Bridge) for HIV-Infected Probationers and Parolees
Individuals on probation and parole are disproportionately at high risk for HIV infection and experience significant barriers to accessing health care. This study was a two-group randomized controlled trial conducted at a community corrections office and was designed to link HIV positive probationers/parolees to HIV treatment in the community. HIV positive participants were assigned to one of the two treatment conditions: (1) Project Bridge (PB), an intensive case-management intervention; or (2) treatment as usual (TAU), involving standard referral to treatment. We hypothesized that PB would be more effective than TAU in terms of initiating individuals in community HIV treatment. We found no difference in rates of, or time to, treatment initiation when comparing the PB to TAU (all ns > 0.05). Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference between HIV medication regiment initiation by treatment condition (all p > 0.05). Despite limitations, we found that probationers and parolees were willing to be screened and linked to treatment. Las personas en período de prueba y libertad condicional tienen un riesgo desproporcionado de infección con el virus de inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH) y experimentan barreras significantes para acceder a la atención médica. Esta investigación fue un ensayo aleatorio controlado con dos grupos y llevado a cabo en una oficina de corrección de la comunidad y fue diseñado para conectar a personas VIH positivas en período de prueba y/o libertad condicional con tratamientos disponibles para VIH en la comunidad. Participantes con un diagnóstico VIH positivo fueron asignados, por género, a una de las dos condiciones de tratamiento: 1) Project Bridge (PB), una intervención intensiva de manejo de casos; o 2) tratamiento usual (TAU por sus siglas en inglés), el cual fue una referencia estándar para el tratamiento. Nosotros planteamos como hipótesis que PB sería más efectivo que TAU en términos de iniciación de individuos a tratamiento de VIH comunitario. Al comparar el PB con el TAU, no encontramos diferencias en las tasas de iniciación de tratamiento, ni en el tiempo para iniciación del tratamiento. Adicionalmente, no hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativa entre el PB o el TAU al comparar el inicio de regímenes médicos para el tratamiento de VIH (todo ns > 0.05). A pesar de las limitaciones, encontramos que las personas en período de prueba y libertad condicional estaban dispuestas a someterse a exámenes de VIH y conectarse a tratamientos disponibles.
- 1 October 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
- Vol. 81, 66-72
Assessing informed consent in an opioid relapse prevention study with adults under current or recent criminal justice supervision
- 1 October 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
- Vol. 81, 66-72
Assessing informed consent in an opioid relapse prevention study with adults under current or recent criminal justice supervision
- Open Access
- 16 May 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
- Vol. 12 (1) , 24
Cohort profile: seek, test, treat and retain United States criminal justice cohort
The STTR treatment cascade provides a framework for research aimed at improving the delivery of services, care and outcomes of PLWH. The development of effective approaches to increase HIV diagnoses and engage PLWH in subsequent steps of the treatment cascade could lead to earlier and sustained ART treatment resulting in viral suppression. There is an unmet need for research applying the treatment cascade to improve outcomes for those with criminal justice involvement. The Seek, Test, Treat, and Retain (STTR) criminal justice (CJ) cohort combines data from 11 studies across the HIV treatment cascade that focused on persons involved in the criminal justice system, often but not exclusively for reasons related to substance use. The studies were conducted in a variety of CJ settings and collected information across 11 pre-selected domains: demographic characteristics, CJ involvement, HIV risk behaviors, HIV and/or Hepatitis C infections, laboratory measures of CD4 T-cell count (CD4) and HIV RNA viral load (VL), mental illness, health related quality of life (QoL), socioeconomic status, health care access, substance use, and social support. The STTR CJ cohort includes data on 11,070 individuals with and without HIV infection who range in age from 18 to 77 years, with a median age at baseline of 37 years. The cohort reflects racial, ethnic and gender distributions in the U.S. CJ system, and 64% of participants are African-American, 12% are Hispanic and 83% are men. Cohort members reported a wide range of HIV risk behaviors including history of injection drug use and, among those who reported on pre-incarceration sexual behaviors, the prevalence of unprotected sexual intercourse ranged across studies from 4% to 79%. Across all studies, 53% percent of the STTR CJ cohort reported recent polysubstance use. The STTR CJ cohort is comprised of participants from a wide range of CJ settings including jail, prison, and community supervision who report considerable diversity in their characteristics and behavioral practices. We have developed harmonized measures, where feasible, to improve the integration of these studies together to answer questions that cannot otherwise be addressed.
- 16 May 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
- Vol. 12 (1) , 24
Open AccessCohort profile: seek, test, treat and retain United States criminal justice cohort
The STTR treatment cascade provides a framework for research aimed at improving the delivery of services, care and outcomes of PLWH. The development of effective approaches to increase HIV diagnoses and engage PLWH in subsequent steps of the treatment cascade could lead to earlier and sustained ART treatment resulting in viral suppression. There is an unmet need for research applying the treatment cascade to improve outcomes for those with criminal justice involvement. The Seek, Test, Treat, and Retain (STTR) criminal justice (CJ) cohort combines data from 11 studies across the HIV treatment cascade that focused on persons involved in the criminal justice system, often but not exclusively for reasons related to substance use. The studies were conducted in a variety of CJ settings and collected information across 11 pre-selected domains: demographic characteristics, CJ involvement, HIV risk behaviors, HIV and/or Hepatitis C infections, laboratory measures of CD4 T-cell count (CD4) and HIV RNA viral load (VL), mental illness, health related quality of life (QoL), socioeconomic status, health care access, substance use, and social support. The STTR CJ cohort includes data on 11,070 individuals with and without HIV infection who range in age from 18 to 77 years, with a median age at baseline of 37 years. The cohort reflects racial, ethnic and gender distributions in the U.S. CJ system, and 64% of participants are African-American, 12% are Hispanic and 83% are men. Cohort members reported a wide range of HIV risk behaviors including history of injection drug use and, among those who reported on pre-incarceration sexual behaviors, the prevalence of unprotected sexual intercourse ranged across studies from 4% to 79%. Across all studies, 53% percent of the STTR CJ cohort reported recent polysubstance use. The STTR CJ cohort is comprised of participants from a wide range of CJ settings including jail, prison, and community supervision who report considerable diversity in their characteristics and behavioral practices. We have developed harmonized measures, where feasible, to improve the integration of these studies together to answer questions that cannot otherwise be addressed.