Mary K. Crow

We read with interest the recent article by Shrestha et al. examining antiphospholipid antibodies in acute Lyme disease and post-treatment Lyme disease syndrome (PTLDS) (1). The study provides valuable longitudinal data on antiphospholipid antibody responses following Borrelia burgdorferi infection. We believe, however, that several conclusions in the article regarding biomarker utility, disease specificity, and pathogenicity are not fully supported by the analyses presented.

Type I interferons (IFNs), particularly IFNα and IFNβ, play a crucial role in the human immune response against viral infections. This review delves into the multifaceted antiviral, immunomodulatory, and antitumor physiological roles of type I IFNs, while describing their contribution to the pathogenesis of various disease pathologies including cancer, systemic and organ-specific autoimmunity, neuroinflammation, and atherosclerosis. Genetic determinants influencing activation of type I IFN pathways and therapeutic interventions either targeting or stimulating these pathways in the context of autoimmunity and cancer, respectively, are also discussed. Ultimately, the current understanding of the role of type I IFNs as biomarkers indicative of distinct clinical and serological phenotypes, their correlation with disease activity, their predictive role in therapeutic outcomes across diverse clinical scenarios, as well as the challenges associated with their implementation in clinical practice, are thoroughly addressed. Together, these insights underscore the significant potential of type I IFNs, as mediators and therapeutic targets, to reshape clinical decision-making, while highlighting the urgent need for robust, standardized methodologies for assessment of type I IFNs and their integration into routine practice.

Plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) infiltrate the skin, chronically produce type I interferon (IFN-I), and promote skin lesions and fibrosis in autoimmune patients. However, what controls their activation in the skin is unknown. Here, we report that increased stiffness inhibits the production of IFN-I by pDCs. Mechanistically, mechanosensing activates stress pathways including NRF2, which induces the pentose phosphate pathway and reduces pyruvate levels, a product necessary for pDC responses. Modulating NRF2 activity in vivo controlled the pDC response, leading to resolution or chronic induction of IFN-I in the skin. In systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients, although NRF2 was induced in skin-infiltrating pDCs, as compared with blood pDCs, the IFN response was maintained. We observed that CXCL4, a profibrotic chemokine elevated in fibrotic skin, was able to overcome stiffness-mediated IFN-I inhibition, allowing chronic IFN-I responses by pDCs in the skin. Hence, these data identify a novel regulatory mechanism exerted by the skin microenvironment and identify points of dysregulation of this mechanism in patients with skin inflammation and fibrosis.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a prime example of how the interplay between genetic and environmental factors can trigger systemic autoimmunity, particularly in young women. Although clinical disease can take years to manifest, risk is established by the unique genetic makeup of an individual. Genome-wide association studies have identified almost 200 SLE-associated risk loci, yet unravelling the functional effect of these loci remains a challenge. New analytic tools have enabled researchers to delve deeper, leveraging DNA sequencing and cell-specific and immune pathway analysis to elucidate the immunopathogenic mechanisms. Both common genetic variants and rare non-synonymous mutations can interact to increase SLE risk. Notably, variants strongly associated with SLE are often located in genome super-enhancers that regulate MHC class II gene expression. Additionally, the 3D conformations of DNA and RNA contribute to genome regulation and innate immune system activation. Improved therapies for SLE are urgently needed and current and future knowledge from genetic and genomic research should provide new tools to facilitate patient diagnosis, enhance the identification of therapeutic targets and optimize testing of agents.

Objective: Quality of care (QoC) delivery in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) continues to suffer from various challenges (eg, delay in diagnosis and referral) that can lead to poor patient outcomes. This study aimed to identify good practice interventions that address these challenges in RA care in North America.Methods: The study was conducted in three steps: (1) literature review of existing publications and guidelines (April 2005 to April 2021) on QoC in RA; (2) in‐person visits to >50 individual specialists and health care professionals across nine rheumatology centers in the United States and Canada to identify challenges in RA care and any corresponding good practice interventions; and (3) collation and organization of findings of the two previous methods by commonalities to identify key good practice interventions, followed by further review by RA experts to ensure key challenges and gaps in RA care were captured.Results: Several challenges and eight good practice interventions were identified in RA care. The interventions were prioritized based on the perceived positive impact on the challenges in care and ease of implementation. High‐priority interventions included the use of technology to improve care, streamlining specialist treatment, and facilitating comorbidity assessment and care. Other interventions included enabling patient access to optimal medication regimens and improving patient self‐management strategies.Conclusion: Learnings from the study can be implemented in other rheumatology centers throughout North America to improve RA care. Although the study was completed before the COVID‐19 pandemic, the findings remain relevant.

The discovery of interferon in the 1950s represents much more than the identification of the first cytokine and the key mediator of antiviral host defense. Defining the molecular nature and complexity of the type I interferon family, as well as its inducers and molecular mechanisms of action, was the work of investigators working at the highest level and producing insights of great consequence. Current knowledge of receptor–ligand interactions, cell signaling, and transcriptional regulation derives from studies of type I interferon. It is on the shoulders of the giants who produced that knowledge that others stand and have revealed critical mechanisms of the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus and other autoimmune diseases. The design of novel therapeutics is informed by the advances in investigation of type I interferon, with the potential for important impact on patient management.

The Advances in Targeted Therapies meets annually, convening experts in the field of rheumatology to both provide scientific updates and identify existing scientific gaps within the field. To review the major unmet scientific needs in rheumatology. The 23rd annual Advances in Targeted Therapies meeting convened with more than 100 international basic scientists and clinical researchers in rheumatology, immunology, infectious diseases, epidemiology, molecular biology and other specialties relating to all aspects of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. We held breakout sessions in five rheumatological disease-specific groups including: rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), axial spondyloarthritis (axSpa), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis (SSc) and vasculitis, and osteoarthritis (OA). In each group, experts were asked to identify and prioritise current unmet needs in clinical and translational research. An overarching theme across all disease states is the continued need for clinical trial design innovation with regard to therapeutics, endpoint and disease endotypes. Within RA, unmet needs comprise molecular classification of disease pathogenesis and activity, pre-/early RA strategies, more refined pain profiling and innovative trials designs to deliver on precision medicine. Continued scientific questions within PsA include evaluating the genetic, immunophenotypic, clinical signatures that predict development of PsA in patients with psoriasis, and the evaluation of combination therapies for difficult-to-treat disease. For axSpA, there continues to be the need to understand the role of interleukin-23 (IL-23) in pathogenesis and the genetic relationship of the IL-23-receptor polymorphism with other related systemic inflammatory diseases (eg, inflammatory bowel disease). A major unmet need in the OA field remains the need to develop the ability to reliably phenotype and stratify patients for inclusion in clinical trials. SLE experts identified a number of unmet needs within clinical trial design including the need for allowing endpoints that reflect pharmacodynamic/functional outcomes (eg, inhibition of type I interferon pathway activation; changes in urine biomarkers). Lastly, within SSc and vasculitis, there is a lack of biomarkers that predict response or disease progression, and that allow patients to be stratified for therapies. There remains a strong need to innovate clinical trial design, to identify systemic and tissue-level biomarkers that predict progression or response to therapy, endotype disease, and to continue developing therapies and therapeutic strategies for those with treatment-refractory disease. This document, based on expert consensus, should provide a roadmap for prioritising scientific endeavour in the field of rheumatology.

Background Type I interferons (IFN-Is) play a role in a broad range of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs), and compelling evidence suggests that their measurement could have clinical value, although testing has not progressed into clinical settings. Objective To develop evidence-based points to consider (PtC) for the measurement and reporting of IFN-I assays in clinical research and to determine their potential clinical utility. Methods EULAR standardised operating procedures were followed. A task force including rheumatologists, immunologists, translational scientists and a patient partner was formed. Two systematic reviews were conducted to address methodological and clinical questions. PtC were formulated based on the retrieved evidence and expert opinion. Level of evidence and agreement was determined. Results Two overarching principles and 11 PtC were defined. The first set (PtC 1–4) concerned terminology, assay characteristics and reporting practices to enable more consistent reporting and facilitate translation and collaborations. The second set (PtC 5–11) addressed clinical applications for diagnosis and outcome assessments, including disease activity, prognosis and prediction of treatment response. The mean level of agreement was generally high, mainly in the first PtC set and for clinical applications in systemic lupus erythematosus. Harmonisation of assay methodology and clinical validation were key points for the research agenda. Conclusions IFN-I assays have a high potential for implementation in the clinical management of RMDs. Uptake of these PtC will facilitate the progress of IFN-I assays into clinical practice and may be also of interest beyond rheumatology.